Broso P
M. International Academy of Cytology, Ivrea (TO).
Minerva Ginecol. 1995 Nov;47(11):503-7.
In contrast to cervical cancer, no routine mass screening programs for the early detection of endometrial cancer have been organized. All of the methods used by cytologists for studying endometrial changes have limitations. Cervicovaginal smears allow diagnosis of, at best, 60% to 70% of carcinomas of the endometrium. Intrauterine sampling is another possible method. It consists of direct aspiration of uterine cavity, scraping or brushing of the mucosa or uterine washing. Any method of endometrial sampling is imperfect, even dilatation and curettage has been shown to miss endometrial carcinoma. The lack of an effective, inexpensive and easy-to-use sampling method is the reason for the nonexistent decline in the incidence of invasive endometrial carcinoma.
与宫颈癌不同,目前尚未组织针对子宫内膜癌早期检测的常规大规模筛查项目。细胞学家用于研究子宫内膜变化的所有方法都存在局限性。宫颈阴道涂片最多只能诊断出60%至70%的子宫内膜癌。子宫内取样是另一种可能的方法。它包括直接抽吸子宫腔、刮取或刷取黏膜或进行子宫冲洗。任何子宫内膜取样方法都不完美,甚至刮宫术也已被证明会漏诊子宫内膜癌。缺乏一种有效、廉价且易于使用的取样方法是浸润性子宫内膜癌发病率未下降的原因。