• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血压。双臂差异评估。

Blood pressure. Assessment of interarm differences.

作者信息

Singer A J, Hollander J E

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center, State University of New York, Stony Brook, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1996 Sep 23;156(17):2005-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.156.17.2005.

DOI:10.1001/archinte.156.17.2005
PMID:8823153
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although a large interarm blood pressure difference is assumed to help identify patients with aortic dissection, the degree of normal interarm blood pressure variation has not been well defined.

METHODS

To determine the normal variation in bilateral upper-extremity blood pressure measurements, we conducted a prospective observational study on a convenience sample of ambulatory patients who were seen at a university hospital emergency department. Bilateral upper-extremity blood pressure measurements were performed with an automated blood pressure monitor at the time the patient was seen. Clinical and demographic data collected included age, sex, race, medical history, chief complaint, cardiac risk factors, pulse, bilateral blood pressure measurements, and discharge diagnosis. The primary outcome measures were the interarm blood pressure differences.

RESULTS

Of 610 patients, 324 (53%) had a systolic or a diastolic interarm blood pressure difference of more than 10 mm Hg, and 113 (19%) had a systolic or a diastolic interarm blood pressure difference of more than 20 mm Hg. The variation in interarm blood pressure measurements was unrelated to age, gender, race, mean arterial pressure, cardiovascular risk factors, or discharge diagnosis. The mean interarm systolic blood pressure difference was significantly greater in patients with known coronary artery disease (14.5 vs 10.4 mm Hg; P = .05, Student t test).

CONCLUSION

Bilateral upper-extremity blood pressure determinations, as measured by automated indirect measurement, have a wide degree of interarm variation.

摘要

背景

尽管双臂血压差异大被认为有助于识别主动脉夹层患者,但正常双臂血压的变化程度尚未得到明确界定。

方法

为确定双侧上肢血压测量的正常变化,我们对一家大学医院急诊科的门诊患者便利样本进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。在患者就诊时,使用自动血压监测仪测量双侧上肢血压。收集的临床和人口统计学数据包括年龄、性别、种族、病史、主要症状、心脏危险因素、脉搏、双侧血压测量值以及出院诊断。主要结局指标为双臂血压差异。

结果

610例患者中,324例(53%)双臂收缩压或舒张压差异超过10 mmHg,113例(19%)双臂收缩压或舒张压差异超过20 mmHg。双臂血压测量值的变化与年龄、性别、种族、平均动脉压、心血管危险因素或出院诊断无关。已知患有冠状动脉疾病的患者双臂收缩压平均差异显著更大(14.5对10.4 mmHg;P = 0.05,学生t检验)。

结论

通过自动间接测量法测定的双侧上肢血压存在较大的双臂间差异。

相似文献

1
Blood pressure. Assessment of interarm differences.血压。双臂差异评估。
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Sep 23;156(17):2005-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.156.17.2005.
2
The unilateral measurement of blood pressure may mask the diagnosis or delay the effective treatment of hypertension.单侧测量血压可能会掩盖高血压的诊断或延误其有效治疗。
Angiology. 2005 Sep-Oct;56(5):565-9. doi: 10.1177/000331970505600507.
3
Associations Between Systolic Interarm Differences in Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes and Mortality: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis, Development and Validation of a Prognostic Algorithm: The INTERPRESS-IPD Collaboration.血压双侧上肢收缩压差值与心血管疾病结局和死亡率的关系:个体参与者数据荟萃分析,预后算法的制定和验证:INTERPRESS-IPD 协作。
Hypertension. 2021 Feb;77(2):650-661. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15997. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
4
Interarm blood pressure difference in a post-stroke population.中风后人群的双臂血压差异
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2017 Sep;11(9):565-572.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
5
Consistency of blood pressure differences between the left and right arms.左右臂血压差异的一致性。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 26;167(4):388-93. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.4.388.
6
Interarm blood pressure difference in people with diabetes: measurement and vascular and mortality implications: a cohort study.有糖尿病的人双臂血压差异:测量方法以及对血管和死亡率的影响:一项队列研究。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jun;37(6):1613-20. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1576. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
7
Interarm blood pressure differences in the women's interagency HIV study.女性机构间艾滋病研究中的双臂血压差异
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2008 May;24(5):695-700. doi: 10.1089/aid.2007.0237.
8
Association of interarm blood pressure difference with cardio-cerebral vascular disease: A community-based, cross-sectional study.双臂血压差异与心脑血管疾病的关联:一项基于社区的横断面研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Aug;21(8):1115-1123. doi: 10.1111/jch.13604. Epub 2019 Jul 14.
9
The systolic blood pressure difference between arms and cardiovascular disease in the Framingham Heart Study.双臂血压差值与弗雷明汉心脏研究中心的心血管疾病。
Am J Med. 2014 Mar;127(3):209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.027. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
10
The normal difference in bilateral indirect blood pressure recordings in hypertensive individuals.高血压患者双侧间接血压记录的正常差异。
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Apr;9(4):342-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01333.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Limb Ischemia Presenting as a Clinical Conundrum: Stroke Mimic or Aortic Dissection?表现为临床难题的急性肢体缺血:类似中风还是主动脉夹层?
Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. 2025 Mar 26;12(4):005317. doi: 10.12890/2025_005317. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical and Biochemical Differences in Patients Having Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding on NSAIDs, Oral Anticoagulants, and Antiplatelet Therapy.使用非甾体抗炎药、口服抗凝剂和抗血小板治疗的非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的临床和生化差异
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 22;13(18):5622. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185622.
3
Diagnosing aortic dissection: A review of this elusive, lethal diagnosis.
诊断主动脉夹层:对这一难以捉摸的致命诊断的综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Jul 8;5(4):e13225. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13225. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
D-dimer as a Rule-Out for Aortic Dissection.D-二聚体用于排除主动脉夹层。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 8;15(12):e50170. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50170. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Characterizing Agreement in the Level of Interarm Blood Pressure Readings of Adults in the Emergency Department (CALIBRATE Study).急诊科成人双臂血压读数水平的一致性特征分析(校准研究)
Qatar Med J. 2020 May 4;2020(1):14. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2020.14. eCollection 2020.
6
Short-term blood pressure variability - variation between arm side, body position and successive measurements: a population-based cohort study.短期血压变异性——手臂两侧、身体姿势及连续测量之间的变异性:一项基于人群的队列研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jan 18;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0468-7.
7
Prevalence of systolic inter-arm differences in blood pressure for different primary care populations: systematic review and meta-analysis.不同基层医疗人群收缩压双臂差值的患病率:系统评价与荟萃分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Nov;66(652):e838-e847. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687553. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
8
Inter-arm blood pressure difference and mortality: a cohort study in an asymptomatic primary care population at elevated cardiovascular risk.双臂血压差异与死亡率:一项针对心血管风险升高的无症状初级保健人群的队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 May;66(646):e297-308. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X684949. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
9
Considerations for SphygmoCor radial artery pulse wave analysis: side selection and peripheral arterial blood pressure calibration.SphygmoCor桡动脉脉搏波分析的注意事项:测量侧选择及外周动脉血压校准。
Hypertens Res. 2015 Oct;38(10):675-83. doi: 10.1038/hr.2015.36. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
10
Inter-arm blood pressure difference in hospitalized elderly patients--is it consistent?住院老年患者双臂血压差异——是否一致?
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Jul;16(7):518-23. doi: 10.1111/jch.12345. Epub 2014 May 30.