Hartigan C, Miller L, Liewehr S C
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tufts University Medical School, Boston, USA.
Orthop Clin North Am. 1996 Oct;27(4):841-60.
In spite of the favorable natural history and the nonserious nature of the problem of much work-related low back and neck pain, conventional rehabilitation methods have failed to reduce work disability. Recently, rehabilitation goals have shifted from exclusively reducing or eradicating pain to improving patients' work and activity tolerance, avoiding illness behaviors, and preventing deconditioning and chronicity. Rehabilitation programs must incorporate strategies that have been proved to improve outcome in randomized, controlled trials. Treatment should be based on duration of symptoms, severity of impairment, and patient response. Consideration must be given to physical and psychological therapeutic milieu. Acute patients should be educated that pain is a normal part of recovery, and that activity maintenance improves outcome. Therapy should focus on restoring or maintaining flexibility, strength, and level of fitness while maintaining maximum productivity. Some acute patients may wish to change health habits and may undergo several sessions of general and low back conditioning training with the development of a health-club or home maintenance regimen. Patients failing to respond favorably to acute treatment and other subacute patients should participate in quota-based graded exercise regimens, with behavioral management. Quantification of function for flexibility, trunk strength, lifting capacity, and cardiovascular fitness is recommended to document progress and guide treatment. "Wellness" is stressed. Incorporating direct return-to-work advice into the treatment plan is important, as is direct communication with the employer throughout treatment. Patients should be cleared for full-duty return to work at treatment end in most circumstances. Successfully managed patients will feel confident about abilities for work and general activities. Intensive management of subacute patients may require 4 to 6 weeks and 12 to 18 comprehensive rehabilitation sessions. Once such comprehensive treatment has been provided, patients may be deemed at a medical endpoint, and further "chronic" rehabilitation treatment should not be necessary. The rehabilitation principles discussed here for work-injured low back and neck pain patients may be used to treat other industrial injuries as long as medical clearance is given for applying the treatment model. Specific time frames for recovery and expected performance for specific diagnoses need to be developed.
尽管许多与工作相关的腰颈疼痛问题具有良好的自然病程且性质并不严重,但传统的康复方法未能减少工作残疾。最近,康复目标已从单纯减轻或消除疼痛转向提高患者的工作和活动耐受性、避免疾病行为以及预防身体机能下降和慢性化。康复计划必须纳入在随机对照试验中已被证明能改善疗效的策略。治疗应基于症状持续时间、损伤严重程度和患者反应。必须考虑身体和心理治疗环境。应告知急性患者疼痛是恢复过程中的正常部分,保持活动能改善疗效。治疗应专注于恢复或保持灵活性、力量和健康水平,同时保持最高生产力。一些急性患者可能希望改变健康习惯,并可能随着健身俱乐部或家庭维持方案的制定,接受几节全身和腰背部调理训练课程。对急性治疗反应不佳的患者以及其他亚急性患者应参加基于配额的分级运动方案,并进行行为管理。建议对灵活性、躯干力量、举重能力和心血管健康进行功能量化,以记录进展并指导治疗。强调“健康”。将直接的重返工作建议纳入治疗计划很重要,在整个治疗过程中与雇主直接沟通也同样重要。在大多数情况下,患者应在治疗结束时被批准全勤重返工作岗位。成功接受管理的患者会对自己的工作和日常活动能力充满信心。对亚急性患者的强化管理可能需要4至6周以及12至18次综合康复治疗课程。一旦提供了这样的综合治疗,患者可能被视为达到了医学终点,进一步的“慢性”康复治疗应该就不再必要了。这里讨论的针对工作中受伤的腰颈疼痛患者的康复原则,只要获得应用该治疗模式的医学许可,就可用于治疗其他工伤。需要制定针对特定诊断的具体恢复时间框架和预期表现。