Mosley J W, Huang W, Stram D O, Nowicki M J, Hollinger F B, Aach R D, Stevens C E, Barbosa L H, Nemo G J
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Transfusion. 1996 Sep;36(9):776-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1996.36996420752.x.
Hepatitis virus(es) that are neither hepatitis B (HBV) nor hepatitis C (HCV) (non-B, non-C [NBNC]) may be transmitted by transfusion. The present study assessed donor values for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) for their association with HCV and NBNC hepatitis outcomes among allogeneic blood recipients.
Data on blood donors and recipients enrolled in the Transfusion- Transmitted Viruses Study in four United States cities from 1974 through 1980 were supplemented by anti-HBc testing of donors and anti-HCV evaluation of recipients. Two statistical approaches estimated the value of these indirect tests in detecting donors associated with HCV seroconversion and NBNC hepatitis in recipients.
For HCV cases, donor ALT alone (at > or = 60 IU/L) had a sensitivity and a specificity of 30 and 96 percent, respectively, and anti-HBc alone (at > or = 60% inhibition) had a sensitivity and specificity of 53 and 86 percent, respectively. The two markers combined had a sensitivity and a specificity of 69 and 83 percent. For NBNC hepatitis cases, each measure had low sensitivity (20%) that was not improved by using both (28%) [corrected].
The indirect tests proved to be equal in sensitivity to the first-generation anti-HCV tests. The positive predictive power of these indirect tests in the 1980s was sufficient to affect HCV incidence in studies during that period. Improved anti-HCV assays, however, replaced the need for indirect tests. The sensitivity of indirect tests for NBNC hepatitis contributed little.
既非乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)也非丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的肝炎病毒(非B、非C [NBNC])可能通过输血传播。本研究评估了丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)和乙型肝炎核心抗原抗体(抗-HBc)在同种异体输血受者中与HCV和NBNC肝炎结局的相关性,以此来确定献血者的价值。
对1974年至1980年在美国四个城市进行的输血传播病毒研究中登记的献血者和受血者的数据,补充了献血者的抗-HBc检测和受血者的抗-HCV评估。两种统计方法估计了这些间接检测在检测与受血者中HCV血清转化和NBNC肝炎相关的献血者方面的价值。
对于HCV病例,仅献血者ALT(≥60 IU/L)的敏感性和特异性分别为30%和96%,仅抗-HBc(≥60%抑制率)的敏感性和特异性分别为53%和86%。两种标志物联合使用时,敏感性和特异性分别为69%和83%。对于NBNC肝炎病例,每种检测方法的敏感性都较低(20%),联合使用两种方法也未得到改善(28%)[校正后]。
事实证明,这些间接检测的敏感性与第一代抗-HCV检测相当。这些间接检测在20世纪80年代的阳性预测能力足以影响该时期研究中的HCV发病率。然而,改进后的抗-HCV检测方法取代了间接检测的需求。间接检测对NBNC肝炎的敏感性贡献不大。