Suppr超能文献

每日两次与每日一次评估家庭子宫活动监测数据的围产期及医疗保健管理后果

Perinatal and health care management consequences of twice-a-day versus once-a-day evaluation of home uterine activity monitoring data.

作者信息

Beckmann C A, Beckmann C R, Stanziano G J, Bergauer N K, Martin C B

机构信息

University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Nursing, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Finance. 1996 Summer;22(4):15-21.

PMID:8827481
Abstract

There was a significant increase in the number of physician interventions (additional testing of mother or baby; extra office, emergency, or labor and delivery unit visits; and especially extra hospitalizations) but no significant difference in perinatal outcome (illness in mother or baby) when women at high-risk for preterm labor on home uterine activity monitoring services had scheduled twice-a-day review (BID review) of the home uterine activity monitoring data they had collected versus once-a-day review (OD review).

摘要

接受家庭子宫活动监测服务的早产高危女性,若对其收集的家庭子宫活动监测数据进行每日两次复查(BID复查),而非每日一次复查(OD复查),医生干预措施(对母亲或婴儿进行额外检查、增加门诊、急诊或分娩单元就诊次数,尤其是增加住院次数)的数量会显著增加,但围产期结局(母亲或婴儿患病情况)并无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验