• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢克肟治疗下呼吸道感染患者:美国临床试验结果

Cefixime in the treatment of patients with lower respiratory tract infections: results of US clinical trials.

作者信息

Quintiliani R

机构信息

University of Connecticut, School of Medicine, Hartford, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1996 May-Jun;18(3):373-90; discussion 372. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80019-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80019-1
PMID:8829015
Abstract

Community-acquired acute lower respiratory tract infections are a common cause of illness, accounting for millions of physician visits and prescriptions each year. Cefixime is an extended-spectrum oral cephalosporin with activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis, the most commonly isolated bacterial pathogens. This review presents the results of eight US studies comparing the efficacy and safety of cefixime with those of amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefaclor, cephalexin, and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections. Data for 211 cefixime-treated patients and a range of 19 to 49 patients in the comparator treatment groups were included in the efficacy analysis. Clinical success (cure or improvement) was observed in 94% of cefixime-treated patients; clinical success rates in the comparator treatment groups ranged from 97% for cefuroxime axetil and cefaclor to 79% for amoxicillin/clavulanate. At the end of treatment, the overall eradication rate in the cefixime treatment group was 92% and ranged from 76% (cefaclor) to 98% (cefuroxime axetil) in the comparator treatment groups. The percentage of persistent organisms was highest in the cefaclor (24%) and cephalexin (21%) treatment groups. With the exception of the cephalexin group (4%), the incidence of patients who reported adverse experiences was similar across treatment groups (34% to 50%). Those involving the gastrointestinal tract were by far the most common, and most adverse experiences were rated as mild or moderate in severity.

摘要

社区获得性急性下呼吸道感染是常见的疾病病因,每年导致数百万次就诊和开具处方。头孢克肟是一种广谱口服头孢菌素,对肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌等最常见分离出的细菌病原体具有活性。本综述呈现了八项美国研究的结果,这些研究比较了头孢克肟与阿莫西林、阿莫西林/克拉维酸、头孢克洛、头孢氨苄和头孢呋辛酯在治疗急性下呼吸道感染患者时的疗效和安全性。疗效分析纳入了211例接受头孢克肟治疗患者的数据以及各对照治疗组19至49例患者的数据。94%接受头孢克肟治疗的患者观察到临床成功(治愈或改善);对照治疗组的临床成功率从头孢呋辛酯和头孢克洛的97%到阿莫西林/克拉维酸的79%不等。治疗结束时,头孢克肟治疗组的总体根除率为92%,对照治疗组的根除率从76%(头孢克洛)到98%(头孢呋辛酯)不等。头孢克洛(24%)和头孢氨苄(21%)治疗组中持续存在病原体的百分比最高。除头孢氨苄组(4%)外,各治疗组报告不良经历的患者发生率相似(34%至50%)。其中涉及胃肠道的不良经历最为常见,且大多数不良经历的严重程度被评为轻度或中度。

相似文献

1
Cefixime in the treatment of patients with lower respiratory tract infections: results of US clinical trials.头孢克肟治疗下呼吸道感染患者:美国临床试验结果
Clin Ther. 1996 May-Jun;18(3):373-90; discussion 372. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80019-1.
2
Efficacy and safety of clarithromycin compared to cefixime as outpatient treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.克拉霉素与头孢克肟作为门诊治疗下呼吸道感染的疗效及安全性比较。
Chest. 1993 Nov;104(5):1393-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.5.1393.
3
Cefixime. A review of its therapeutic efficacy in lower respiratory tract infections.头孢克肟。其在下呼吸道感染中治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1995 Jun;49(6):1007-22. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549060-00010.
4
Multi-investigator evaluation of the efficacy and safety of cefprozil, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefixime and cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media.多位研究者对头孢丙烯、阿莫西林-克拉维酸、头孢克肟和头孢克洛治疗急性中耳炎的疗效和安全性进行的评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Oct;13(10):857-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02111353.
5
Safety and efficacy of cefixime versus cefaclor in respiratory tract infections.
J Chemother. 1989 Aug;1(4):257-60. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.1989.11738903.
6
In vitro activity of a new broad-spectrum, beta-lactamase-stable oral cephalosporin, cefixime, in comparison with other drugs, against Haemophilus influenzae, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae.一种新型广谱、β-内酰胺酶稳定的口服头孢菌素——头孢克肟,与其他药物相比,对流感嗜血杆菌、副流感嗜血杆菌、卡他莫拉菌和肺炎链球菌的体外活性。
Chemotherapy. 1992;38(1):36-45. doi: 10.1159/000238940.
7
Multicenter surveillance of antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis to 14 oral antibiotics.对化脓性链球菌、肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌对14种口服抗生素耐药性的多中心监测。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2004 Sep;103(9):664-70.
8
Comparative, multicenter studies of cefixime and amoxicillin in the treatment of respiratory tract infections.头孢克肟与阿莫西林治疗呼吸道感染的对比性多中心研究。
Am J Med. 1988 Sep 16;85(3A):6-13. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90457-3.
9
Cefprozil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential.头孢丙烯。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗潜力的综述。
Drugs. 1993 Feb;45(2):295-317. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345020-00008.
10
Susceptibility of respiratory tract pathogens in Finland to cefixime and nine other antimicrobial agents.芬兰呼吸道病原体对头孢克肟及其他九种抗菌药物的敏感性
Scand J Infect Dis. 1993;25(3):373-8. doi: 10.3109/00365549309008513.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of hACE2-interacting sites in SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain for antiviral drugs screening.鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 刺突受体结合域中与 hACE2 相互作用的位点,用于抗病毒药物筛选。
Virus Res. 2022 Nov;321:198915. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2022.198915. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CEFIXIME AND CIPROFLOXACIN IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ADULTS WITH COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA IN IBADAN, NIGERIA.头孢克肟与环丙沙星治疗尼日利亚伊巴丹社区获得性肺炎成人患者的疗效及安全性比较
Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2015 Dec;13(2):72-8.
3
Efficacy and Tolerability of 5- vs 10-Day Cefixime Therapy in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis.
头孢克肟 5 天与 10 天疗法治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Drug Investig. 1998;15(1):13-20. doi: 10.2165/00044011-199815010-00002.
4
Children with pneumonia: how do they present and how are they managed?患有肺炎的儿童:他们的症状表现如何以及如何进行治疗?
Arch Dis Child. 2007 May;92(5):394-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.097402. Epub 2007 Jan 29.