• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢克肟 5 天与 10 天疗法治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的疗效和耐受性。

Efficacy and Tolerability of 5- vs 10-Day Cefixime Therapy in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis.

机构信息

2nd Medical Department, District Hospital, Lüdenscheid, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 1998;15(1):13-20. doi: 10.2165/00044011-199815010-00002.

DOI:10.2165/00044011-199815010-00002
PMID:18370461
Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of oral cefixime 400mg once daily for 5 days was compared with standard 10-day therapy in a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial of 222 patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Clinical and bacteriological efficacy were assessed after 6, 11 and 30 days. A total of 167 patients were evaluable for efficacy on a per-protocol basis. Clinical efficacy (cure or improvement based on the quality and quantity of expectorated sputum and symptoms of dyspnoea) at day 11 was statistically equivalent (p < 0.01) between the treatment groups, with a successful clinical response achieved in 91% (5-day) and 89% (10-day) of patients. Bacteriological efficacy was also similar with 5- and 10-day treatment. During treatment, more patients reported an adverse event possibly or probably related to the study medication in the 10-day than in the 5-day treatment group (19 vs 14%). However, this difference was not statistically significant. Oral cefixime 400mg once daily is an effective and well tolerated treatment for acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Short-term (5-day) therapy offers clinical efficacy similar to that of standard (10-day) therapy.

摘要

一项多中心、双盲、随机、对照临床试验比较了口服头孢克肟 400mg 每日 1 次、连用 5 天与标准 10 天疗法治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的疗效和耐受性,共有 222 例患者参与该试验。在第 6、11 和 30 天分别评估临床和细菌学疗效。167 例患者按方案进行疗效评估。第 11 天时,根据痰的质量和数量以及呼吸困难症状,治疗组的临床疗效(治愈或改善)具有统计学等效性(p<0.01),91%(5 天)和 89%(10 天)的患者获得了成功的临床应答。5 天和 10 天治疗的细菌学疗效也相似。在治疗期间,报告与研究药物可能或很可能相关的不良事件的患者在 10 天治疗组多于 5 天治疗组(19 例比 14 例)。然而,这种差异没有统计学意义。口服头孢克肟 400mg 每日 1 次是一种有效且耐受性良好的慢性支气管炎急性加重的治疗方法。短期(5 天)治疗可提供与标准(10 天)治疗相似的临床疗效。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Tolerability of 5- vs 10-Day Cefixime Therapy in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis.头孢克肟 5 天与 10 天疗法治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Drug Investig. 1998;15(1):13-20. doi: 10.2165/00044011-199815010-00002.
2
Short-course moxifloxacin therapy for treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The Bronchitis Study Group.短程莫西沙星治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染。支气管炎研究组。
Respir Med. 2000 Jan;94(1):18-27. doi: 10.1053/rmed.1999.0708.
3
Comparison of 5-day and 10-day cefixime in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.5天和10天头孢克肟治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的比较。
Chemotherapy. 1998 Sep;44 Suppl 1:15-8. doi: 10.1159/000048458.
4
Bacteriological eradication of Streptococcus pneumoniae from patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: cefuroxime axetil versus cefixime.慢性支气管炎急性加重患者肺炎链球菌的细菌学清除:头孢呋辛酯与头孢克肟对比
Int J Clin Pract. 1999 Sep;53(6):437-43.
5
Clinical Comparison of Cefuroxime Axetil with Cefixime in the Treatment of Acute Bronchitis.头孢呋辛酯与头孢克肟治疗急性支气管炎的临床比较
Am J Ther. 1996 Sep;3(9):622-629. doi: 10.1097/00045391-199609000-00004.
6
Comparative efficacy of once daily, 5-day short-course therapy with clarithromycin extended-release versus twice daily, 7-day therapy with clarithromycin immediate-release in acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.在慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染加重期,每日一次服用克拉霉素缓释片进行5天短程治疗与每日两次服用克拉霉素速释片进行7天治疗的疗效比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Feb;21(2):245-54. doi: 10.1185/030079905X26243.
7
A multicentre study comparing the safety and efficacy of dirithromycin with erythromycin in the treatment of bronchitis.一项比较地红霉素与红霉素治疗支气管炎安全性和有效性的多中心研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:139-51. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.139.
8
Five-day telithromycin once daily is as effective as 10-day clarithromycin twice daily for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and is associated with reduced health-care resource utilization.五日一次的泰利霉素与十日两次的克拉霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重同样有效,且能减少医疗资源的使用。
Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):1980-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.4.1980.
9
Five day moxifloxacin therapy compared with 7 day clarithromycin therapy for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.莫西沙星五日疗法与克拉霉素七日疗法治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Oct;44(4):501-13. doi: 10.1093/jac/44.4.501.
10
The efficacy and safety of a new ciprofloxacin suspension compared with co-amoxiclav tablets in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.一种新的环丙沙星混悬液与阿莫西林克拉维酸片相比治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的疗效和安全性。
Respir Med. 1999 Apr;93(4):252-61. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(99)90021-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of the antibiotic treatment courses in AECOPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期抗生素治疗疗程的系统评价与贝叶斯Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jan 20;14:1024807. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1024807. eCollection 2023.
2
Does antibiotic treatment duration affect the outcomes of exacerbations of asthma and COPD? A systematic review.抗生素治疗持续时间是否会影响哮喘和 COPD 加重的结局?系统评价。
Chron Respir Dis. 2018 Aug;15(3):225-240. doi: 10.1177/1479972317745734. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in the activity of macrolide and beta-lactam antibiotics and resistance development. Alexander Project Group.大环内酯类和β-内酰胺类抗生素的活性趋势及耐药性发展。亚历山大项目组。
J Chemother. 1997 May;9 Suppl 3:18-28.
2
Cefixime in the treatment of patients with lower respiratory tract infections: results of US clinical trials.头孢克肟治疗下呼吸道感染患者:美国临床试验结果
Clin Ther. 1996 May-Jun;18(3):373-90; discussion 372. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80019-1.
3
Comparative evaluation of the clinical and microbiological efficacy of co-amoxiclav vs cefixime or ciprofloxacin in bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.
阿莫西林克拉维酸与头孢克肟或环丙沙星治疗慢性支气管炎细菌感染急性加重的临床及微生物学疗效比较评估
J Chemother. 1995 Oct;7(5):432-41. doi: 10.1179/joc.1995.7.5.432.
4
Effectiveness of short-course therapy (5 days) with cefuroxime axetil in treatment of secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis.头孢呋辛酯短程疗法(5天)治疗急性支气管炎继发细菌感染的疗效
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Nov;39(11):2528-34. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.11.2528.
5
Efficacy and safety of clarithromycin compared to cefixime as outpatient treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.克拉霉素与头孢克肟作为门诊治疗下呼吸道感染的疗效及安全性比较。
Chest. 1993 Nov;104(5):1393-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.5.1393.
6
Critical review of microbiological data and methods in diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections.下呼吸道感染诊断中微生物学数据及方法的批判性综述
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1994 Feb;49(1):52-6.
7
Five versus ten days treatment of streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis: a randomized controlled trial comparing cefpodoxime proxetil and phenoxymethyl penicillin.链球菌性咽扁桃体炎的五日与十日治疗:一项比较头孢泊肟酯和青霉素V钾的随机对照试验
Scand J Infect Dis. 1994;26(1):59-66. doi: 10.3109/00365549409008592.
8
Overview of issues related to medical compliance with implications for the outpatient management of infectious diseases.与医疗合规性相关问题概述及其对传染病门诊管理的影响
Infect Agents Dis. 1994 Oct;3(5):266-73.
9
Cefixime. A review of its therapeutic efficacy in lower respiratory tract infections.头孢克肟。其在下呼吸道感染中治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1995 Jun;49(6):1007-22. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549060-00010.
10
Antibiotic therapy in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的抗生素治疗
Ann Intern Med. 1987 Feb;106(2):196-204. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-2-196.