Gemma M, Cozzi S, Piccoli S, Magrin S, De Vitis A, Cenzato M
Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit, Scientific Institute San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1996 Apr;8(2):137-41. doi: 10.1097/00008506-199604000-00007.
Intravenous hypertonic fluid therapy has been proposed to improve secondary ischemic injury after cerebrospinal trauma. We report the case of a 14-year-old boy with vasospasm of the intracranial vertebral arteries and ischemic brain stem damage following head trauma. The patient presented with severe tetraparesis and somatosensory (SSEPs) and brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) impairment. The patient was treated with two subsequent hypertonic saline (HS) infusions, 2.7% and 5.4%, respectively, for a period of 48 sp, followed by standard hypervolemic therapy. After the first treatment with 2.7% HS, improvement of SSEPs without neurological improvement was apparent. Relative hypervolemia was subsequently maintained by administration of crystalloids and 20% albumin for 48 h. During standard hypervolemic therapy, no clinical and/or electrophysiological change occurred. The second infusion of 5.4% HS was concomitant with further amelioration of SSEPs and improvement of motor performance. Twelve hours after the second HS infusion, the neurological status returned to preinfusion levels, while SSEPs showed no further changes. BAEPs never changed during fluid therapy. No complication occurred secondary to the infusion of HS. This case report suggests that local improvement of brain stem perfusion following hypertonic fluid therapy accounts for or relevantly contributes to the neurological and SSEPs improvement of the patient.
静脉输注高渗液疗法已被提出用于改善脑脊髓创伤后的继发性缺血性损伤。我们报告了一例14岁男孩的病例,该男孩在头部创伤后出现颅内椎动脉痉挛和缺血性脑干损伤。患者表现为严重的四肢瘫以及体感诱发电位(SSEPs)和脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEPs)受损。该患者先后接受了两次高渗盐水(HS)输注治疗,浓度分别为2.7%和5.4%,持续48小时,随后进行标准的高血容量疗法。在首次使用2.7% HS治疗后,SSEPs有所改善,但神经功能并无改善。随后通过输注晶体液和20%白蛋白维持相对高血容量48小时。在标准高血容量疗法期间,未出现临床和/或电生理变化。第二次输注5.4% HS时,SSEPs进一步改善,运动功能也有所提高。第二次HS输注12小时后,神经功能状态恢复到输注前水平,而SSEPs未再出现变化。在液体治疗期间,BAEPs从未改变。输注HS未引发任何并发症。该病例报告表明,高渗液疗法后脑干灌注的局部改善是该患者神经功能和SSEPs改善的原因或起到了重要作用。