Morley J A, Finney J W, Monahan S C, Floyd A S
Program Evaluation and Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Addict Behav. 1996 Jul-Aug;21(4):429-43. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(95)00073-9.
We examine the methodological characteristics and provision of study information in 339 alcoholism treatment outcome studies reported between 1980 and 1992. We consider factors in four methodological domains: sampling and description of patients, specification of treatments, outcome variable assessment and follow-up, and treatment effect estimates; we also consider the methodological quality of the studies. Although methodological quality has improved over time, there remains room for improvement. Of special concern is the low statistical power of many studies. Multiple treatment group studies had an average .54 probability of detecting a treatment effect of medium size.
我们考察了1980年至1992年间报告的339项酒精中毒治疗结果研究的方法学特征及研究信息的提供情况。我们考虑四个方法学领域的因素:患者的抽样与描述、治疗方法的具体说明、结果变量评估与随访以及治疗效果估计;我们还考虑了这些研究的方法学质量。尽管随着时间推移方法学质量有所提高,但仍有改进空间。特别令人担忧的是许多研究的统计效力较低。多治疗组研究检测到中等大小治疗效果的平均概率为0.54。