Suppr超能文献

Practice patterns of anesthesiologists regarding situations in obstetric anesthesia where clinical management is controversial.

作者信息

Beilin Y, Bodian C A, Haddad E M, Leibowitz A B

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1996 Oct;83(4):735-41. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199610000-00013.

Abstract

A survey consisting of 47 questions, 40 regarding clinical practice and 7 regarding demographics, was mailed to 153 directors of obstetric anesthesia in academic practice and to 153 anesthesiologists in private practice. Questions relating to the following areas of practice were asked: 1) preoperative laboratory testing; 2) preeclampsia and possible coagulopathies; 3) epidural catheter placement in women with "spinal problems"; and 4) use of epidural opioids and intravenous supplementation. Surveys were returned by 113 (74%) academic anesthesiologists and 94 (61%) private practice anesthesiologists. By univariate analysis, 14 questions showed a significant difference in response between those in academic and private practice, but only eight remained significant after accounting for the amount of clinical time currently devoted to obstetric anesthesia (>50% or < or = 50%). These eight questions related to preoperative laboratory testing in the healthy parturient, preoperative laboratory testing in the preeclamptic patient, and the use of intravenous supplementation during a cesarean section with regional anesthesia. Although there were some differences in the responses between anesthesiologists in academic and private practice, overall the responses were similar.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验