• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫的疗效评估:成人可用的评定量表以及儿童癫痫量表开发中的方法学问题。

Outcome assessment in epilepsy: available rating scales for adults and methodological issues pertaining to the development of scales for childhood epilepsy.

作者信息

Carpay H A, Arts W F

机构信息

Westeinde Hospital, Department of Child Neurology, Den Haag, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 1996 Jul;24(3):127-36. doi: 10.1016/0920-1211(96)00013-7.

DOI:10.1016/0920-1211(96)00013-7
PMID:8832189
Abstract

During the past decade, several scales have been developed to improve the assessment of outcome in epilepsy. These scales were developed for adults and their reliability, validity and usefulness have been established. However, there is also a need for alternative measures of outcome in childhood epilepsy, especially a measure of seizure severity (SS) and measures pertaining to quality of life (QoL). Four of these adult scales are reviewed and compared to examine their applicability in childhood epilepsy. Two important methodological differences between them are discussed: (a) patient self-report vs. physician-based scales and (b) generic vs. disease-specific instruments. QoL in epilepsy is briefly reviewed. Severity of seizures and severity of side-effects are relatively neglected areas of importance to QoL in epilepsy. The existing instruments for adults are not appropriate for children in their present form. Some specific methodological issues, which are relevant for the development of scales for children with epilepsy, are subsequently discussed. New scales pertaining to physical and psychosocial aspects of QoL in childhood epilepsy are being developed. In the near future, data on their reliability, validity and usefulness will become available. A combination of scales focusing on specific aspects of QoL, including SS and severity of adverse effects, and more traditional clinical data may provide a more complete assessment of outcome in childhood epilepsy.

摘要

在过去十年间,已经开发了几种量表来改进癫痫预后的评估。这些量表是针对成年人开发的,其可靠性、有效性和实用性已经得到确立。然而,儿童癫痫的预后也需要有替代评估方法,特别是癫痫发作严重程度(SS)的测量方法以及与生活质量(QoL)相关的测量方法。本文回顾并比较了其中四种成人量表,以考察它们在儿童癫痫中的适用性。讨论了它们之间两个重要的方法学差异:(a)患者自我报告量表与基于医生的量表;(b)通用量表与疾病特异性工具。简要回顾了癫痫的生活质量。癫痫发作的严重程度和副作用的严重程度是癫痫生活质量中相对被忽视但很重要的领域。现有的成人量表目前的形式不适用于儿童。随后讨论了一些与开发儿童癫痫量表相关的具体方法学问题。目前正在开发与儿童癫痫生活质量的身体和心理社会方面相关的新量表。在不久的将来,有关其可靠性、有效性和实用性的数据将会可得。综合关注生活质量特定方面(包括癫痫发作严重程度和不良反应严重程度)的量表以及更传统的临床数据,可能会对儿童癫痫的预后提供更全面的评估。

相似文献

1
Outcome assessment in epilepsy: available rating scales for adults and methodological issues pertaining to the development of scales for childhood epilepsy.癫痫的疗效评估:成人可用的评定量表以及儿童癫痫量表开发中的方法学问题。
Epilepsy Res. 1996 Jul;24(3):127-36. doi: 10.1016/0920-1211(96)00013-7.
2
Parent-completed scales for measuring seizure severity and severity of side-effects of antiepileptic drugs in childhood epilepsy: development and psychometric analysis.用于测量儿童癫痫发作严重程度及抗癫痫药物副作用严重程度的家长完成式量表:编制与心理测量分析
Epilepsy Res. 1996 Jul;24(3):173-81. doi: 10.1016/0920-1211(96)00012-5.
3
Validity of three measures of health-related quality of life in children with intractable epilepsy.三种与健康相关的生活质量测量方法在难治性癫痫患儿中的有效性。
Epilepsia. 2002 Oct;43(10):1230-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.03602.x.
4
Assessing quality of life in patients with epilepsy.评估癫痫患者的生活质量。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 May;9(5):399-416. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199609050-00004.
5
Patient-based assessments of quality of life in newly diagnosed epilepsy patients: validation of the NEWQOL.新诊断癫痫患者基于患者的生活质量评估:NEWQOL的验证
Epilepsia. 2000 Sep;41(9):1119-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00317.x.
6
Health-related quality of life in childhood epilepsy: moving beyond 'seizure control with minimal adverse effects'.儿童癫痫患者的健康相关生活质量:超越“以最小不良反应控制癫痫发作”的范畴
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Aug 28;1:36. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-36.
7
The Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale (PIES).癫痫个人影响量表(PIES)。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Jan;42:140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.09.060. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
8
The impact of epilepsy surgery on quality of life in children.癫痫手术对儿童生活质量的影响。
Neurology. 2006 Feb 28;66(4):557-61. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000197788.38783.09.
9
Development of the quality of life in epilepsy inventory.癫痫生活质量量表的编制
Epilepsia. 1995 Nov;36(11):1089-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1995.tb00467.x.
10
A clinimetric approach to assessing quality of life in epilepsy.一种评估癫痫患者生活质量的临床测量方法。
Epilepsia. 1993;34 Suppl 4:S8-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1993.tb05917.x.

引用本文的文献

1
UGT2B7 gene polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium in pediatric epileptic patients and their influence on sodium valproate monotherapy: A cohort study.儿童癫痫患者UGT2B7基因多态性与连锁不平衡及其对丙戊酸钠单药治疗的影响:一项队列研究
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 9;13:911827. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.911827. eCollection 2022.
2
Association of UGT1A6 gene polymorphism with clinical outcome in pediatric epileptic patients on sodium valproate monotherapy.UGT1A6 基因多态性与丙戊酸钠单药治疗儿童癫痫患者临床结局的相关性。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2021 Jun 14;54(9):e11097. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X2021e11097. eCollection 2021.
3
Severity Assessment in CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder.
CDKL5 缺乏症的严重程度评估。
Pediatr Neurol. 2019 Aug;97:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
4
Adaptation of the Manchester-Minneapolis Quality of Life instrument for use in the UK population.曼彻斯特-明尼阿波利斯生活质量量表在英国人群中的适用性调整。
Arch Dis Child. 2007 Oct;92(10):855-60. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.098947. Epub 2007 May 23.
5
Youth With Epilepsy: Development of a Model of Children's Attitudes Toward Their Condition.患有癫痫的青少年:儿童对自身病情态度模型的构建
Child Health Care. 2006;35(2):123-140. doi: 10.1207/s15326888chc3502_2.
6
Health-related quality of life in childhood epilepsy: moving beyond 'seizure control with minimal adverse effects'.儿童癫痫患者的健康相关生活质量:超越“以最小不良反应控制癫痫发作”的范畴
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Aug 28;1:36. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-36.