Mort T C, Rintel T D, Altman F
Department of Anesthesiology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 1996 Aug;8(5):361-70. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(96)00081-5.
To test the hypothesis that forced-air skin-surface warming used prophylactically after hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) would: (1) decrease the incidence and severity of postbypass shivering, (2) rapidly increase skin-surface temperatures when compared with standard warmed cotton blankets, and (3) not contribute to excessive central temperature elevation.
Prospective, randomized, nonblinded comparison of two rewarming techniques.
Multidisciplinary intensive care unit at a tertiary care, private teaching hospital.
Following hypothermic CPB, 47 patients underwent postoperative rewarming by using either conduction (warmed cotton blankets) or convection (forced-air cover) techniques.
Central and skin temperatures were measured at 30-minute intervals for 5.5 hours postoperatively. Four lead electromyographic recordings were used to objectively document shivering activity. Antihypertensives, opioids, sedatives, and muscle relaxants were administered per patient need and recorded. The forced-air cover markedly decreased the overall incidence, duration, and magnitude of significant shivering compared with the warmed cotton blankets. Forced-air therapy produced clinically significant increases in skin surface temperatures, but avoided excessive central temperature elevation when compared with passive rewarming with cotton blankets.
Convection warming, when compared with conductive warming with cotton blankets, limited the incidence, magnitude, and duration of shivering following hypothermic cardiac surgery. This suggests an important role of cutaneous thermal input in the mediation of the shivering response. The central tissue compartment is buffered from the effects of skin-surface warming and, thus, forced-air therapy will not lead to excessive central temperature elevation in this patient population when compared with cotton blanket rewarming.
验证以下假设,即低温体外循环(CPB)后预防性使用强制空气体表加温会:(1)降低体外循环后寒战的发生率和严重程度;(2)与标准加温棉被相比,能迅速提高体表温度;(3)不会导致中心体温过度升高。
两种复温技术的前瞻性、随机、非盲法比较。
一家私立教学三级医院的多学科重症监护病房。
47例患者在低温CPB后,采用传导(加温棉被)或对流(强制空气覆盖)技术进行术后复温。
术后5.5小时每隔30分钟测量中心体温和体表温度。使用四导联肌电图记录客观记录寒战活动。根据患者需要给予抗高血压药、阿片类药物、镇静剂和肌肉松弛剂,并记录。与加温棉被相比,强制空气覆盖显著降低了明显寒战的总体发生率、持续时间和强度。与用棉被被动复温相比,强制空气疗法使体表温度有临床意义的升高,但避免了中心体温过度升高。
与用棉被进行传导加温相比,对流加温限制了低温心脏手术后寒战的发生率、强度和持续时间。这表明皮肤热输入在寒战反应调节中起重要作用。中心组织腔室可免受体表加温的影响,因此,与棉被复温相比,强制空气疗法不会导致该患者群体中心体温过度升高。