Wei Q, Spitz M R, Gu J, Cheng L, Xu X, Strom S S, Kripke M L, Hsu T C
Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 Mar;5(3):199-204.
This study describes a correlation between cellular DNA repair capacity and the frequency of mutagen-induced in vitro chromosomal breaks in selected lymphoblastoid cell lines. Two assays, host cell reactivation (HCR) assay for measuring cellular DNA repair capacity and in vitro mutagen sensitivity assay, have recently been shown to be useful biomarkers for such susceptibility. Increased in vitro mutagen sensitivity, measured by the number of induced chromatid breaks, has been postulated to reflect decreased capacity of DNA repair, as measured by the HCR assay. However, these two assays have not been examined in parallel to test this hypothesis. In this study, we performed both assays in 16 established lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from patients with xeroderma pigmentosum (n = 3), ataxia telangiectasia (n = 2), head and neck cancer (n = 3), and melanoma (n = 2), and from normal human subjects (n = 6) using UV light, 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO; an UV-mimetic agent), and gamma-irradiation as the test agents. The measurements from the HCR assay correlated significantly with the frequency of chromatid breaks induced by either UV irradiation (r = -0.69; P < 0.01) or 4-NQO (r = -0.70; P < 0.01). Although published data suggest that damage induced by UV and 4-NQO may be repaired by different pathways, the two agents induced similar frequencies of chromatid breaks (r = 0.68; P < 0.01) in the tested cell lines. Our results also indicated that the HCR assay is not suitable to test agents that cause DNA strand breaks, such as gamma-irradiation, whereas the mutagen sensitivity assay is. Although reduced cellular DNA repair capacity correlated with increased frequency of mutagen-induced chromatid breaks in these cell lines, these two assays have different sensitivities in measuring the repair of damage induced by different carcinogens; therefore, the use of both assays is recommended for future molecular epidemiological studies of cancer susceptibility.
本研究描述了特定淋巴母细胞系中细胞DNA修复能力与诱变剂诱导的体外染色体断裂频率之间的相关性。最近有两种检测方法,即用于测量细胞DNA修复能力的宿主细胞再激活(HCR)检测法和体外诱变敏感性检测法,已被证明是此类易感性的有用生物标志物。通过诱导的染色单体断裂数量来衡量的体外诱变敏感性增加,据推测反映了通过HCR检测法测量的DNA修复能力下降。然而,尚未同时进行这两种检测来验证这一假设。在本研究中,我们使用紫外线、4-硝基喹啉-1-氧化物(4-NQO;一种紫外线模拟剂)和γ射线作为测试剂,对来自着色性干皮病患者(n = 3)、共济失调毛细血管扩张症患者(n = 2)、头颈癌患者(n = 3)和黑色素瘤患者(n = 2)以及正常人类受试者(n = 6)的16个已建立的淋巴母细胞系进行了这两种检测。HCR检测的测量结果与紫外线照射(r = -0.69;P < 0.01)或4-NQO(r = -0.70;P < 0.01)诱导的染色单体断裂频率显著相关。尽管已发表的数据表明紫外线和4-NQO诱导的损伤可能通过不同途径修复,但在测试的细胞系中,这两种试剂诱导的染色单体断裂频率相似(r = 0.68;P < 0.01)。我们的结果还表明,HCR检测不适用于检测导致DNA链断裂的试剂,如γ射线,而诱变敏感性检测则适用。虽然在这些细胞系中细胞DNA修复能力降低与诱变剂诱导的染色单体断裂频率增加相关,但这两种检测在测量不同致癌物诱导的损伤修复方面具有不同的敏感性;因此,建议在未来癌症易感性的分子流行病学研究中同时使用这两种检测。