• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Quantification of lipoprotein(a): comparison of an automated latex-enhanced nephelometric assay with an immunoenzymometric method.

作者信息

Schmidt H H, Genschel J C, Wagner S, Manns M P

机构信息

Abt. Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1996 Feb;34(2):119-24. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1996.34.2.119.

DOI:10.1515/cclm.1996.34.2.119
PMID:8833643
Abstract

Several studies indicate the relevance of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) in the genesis of premature coronary artery disease. A simple method for determining the concentration of Lp(a) is therefore of great interest for assessing the risk of coronary artery disease in patients. We compared a new latex-enhanced immunonephelometric assay (Behringwerke AG, Marburg, Germany), using the Behring Nephelometer System 100, with an established immunoenzymometric assay (Immuno, Heidelberg, Germany). A total of 163 patients was studied. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were between 2.2% and 7.1%, and between 3.4% and 8.6%, depending on the concentration of Lp(a). The correlation between the studied assays was excellent (r = 0.93, y = 0.98x -1.57, Spearman rank, Passing & Bablok). When values above 1000 mg/l for Lp(a) were excluded, the correlation was even higher. Increased light scattering with particle size, which hitherto has been a disadvantage of the nephelometric technique, seems to be negligible using the improved latex-enhanced approach. In patients with triacylglycerol values above 4.5 mmol/l (n = 19) there was no interference with the Behring system, i.e. the results of the nephelometric method were not increasing, and they agreed with those of the immunoenzymometric assay. In conclusion, this new latex-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay represents a rapid and precise method for the quantification of Lp(a).

摘要

相似文献

1
Quantification of lipoprotein(a): comparison of an automated latex-enhanced nephelometric assay with an immunoenzymometric method.
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1996 Feb;34(2):119-24. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1996.34.2.119.
2
Evaluation of the analytical performances of a new fully automated commercial immunonephelometric assay for lipoprotein(a).
Clin Chem Lab Med. 1998 Sep;36(9):719-23. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.1998.127.
3
Automated latex nephelometric immunoassay for the measurement of serum lipoprotein (a).用于测量血清脂蛋白(a)的自动化乳胶免疫比浊法
J Clin Lab Anal. 1993;7(2):105-10. doi: 10.1002/jcla.1860070207.
4
Automated turbidimetry of serum lipoprotein(a).血清脂蛋白(a)的自动比浊法
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1993 Dec;31(12):869-74.
5
Evaluation of the Dade Behring N Latex Cystatin C assay on the Dade Behring Nephelometer II System.在德灵第二代散射比浊仪系统上对德灵N乳胶胱抑素C检测法的评估。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999 Feb;59(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/00365519950185940.
6
Evaluation of the new automated ELISA Vidas Lp(a) assay. Comparison with an immunonephelemetric method.
Clin Chim Acta. 1998 Apr 27;272(2):183-95. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(98)00015-1.
7
Fully mechanized latex immunoassay for serum lipoprotein(a).
Clin Chim Acta. 1994 Mar;225(2):105-13. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(94)90038-8.
8
Development and validation of an automated particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay method for the measurement of human plasma C1q.
J Clin Lab Anal. 1995;9(5):302-7. doi: 10.1002/jcla.1860090505.
9
Immunoquantification of lipoprotein(a): comparison of nephelometry with electroimmunodiffusion.脂蛋白(a)的免疫定量分析:散射比浊法与免疫电泳扩散法的比较
J Clin Lab Anal. 1993;7(5):256-62. doi: 10.1002/jcla.1860070504.
10
Automated quantitative nephelometric latex immunoassay for determining ferritin in human serum.
J Clin Lab Anal. 1992;6(4):239-44. doi: 10.1002/jcla.1860060413.