Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜下良性疾病肾切除术:经腹腔与腹膜后入路的比较

Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease: comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.

作者信息

McDougall E M, Clayman R V

机构信息

Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 1996 Feb;10(1):45-9. doi: 10.1089/end.1996.10.45.

Abstract

We report our experience with the transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (RP) approaches for performing laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease. Thirty-three patients with benign renal disease underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy, 23 by the TP and 10 by the RP approach. The average age of the patient, ASA score, and specimen weight were similar for the two groups. The average operating time for the TP approach was 5.6 hours v 5 hours for the RP approach. The average hospital stay was 2.8 and 3 days for TP and RP groups, respectively. The use of postoperative analgesics was similar in the two groups (37 mg of morphine sulfate equivalent v 39 mg of morphine sulfate equivalent for the TP and RP groups, respectively). However, the RP group required less time to resume normal oral intake than the TP group (0.3 v 0.6 days). When assessed according to specimen weight of 100 or less, there was a significant reduction in the postoperative analgesia requirements for the RP group of patients (11 mg of morphine sulfate equivalent v 28 mg of morphine sulfate equivalent for the TP group). In this subgroup of patients, the resumption of oral intake also occurred more quickly in the RP than the TP group (0.4 v 0.5 days). The hospital stay and total convalescence time were similar for the two groups. Four complications occurred in the 33 patients: 2 patients (1 TP and 1 RP), required conversion to open surgery, 1 asthenic patient developed a vastus lateralis bruise undergoing a TP approach, and a brachial nerve palsy occurred in a morbidly obese patient who failed a TP approach. The RP approach to laparoscopic nephrectomy reduces the time to resuming normal oral intake for patients postoperatively and, in those patients with a small specimen, may significantly reduce their postoperative analgesia requirements. However, the RP approach for laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease does not significantly improve the length of hospital stay or the patient's ultimate postoperative return to normal activity in comparison to the TP approach. There does appear to be a trend toward a shorter operative time for the RP approach. The RP laparoscopic approach is our method of choice for patients with benign renal disease.

摘要

我们报告了采用经腹腔(TP)和腹膜后(RP)途径进行腹腔镜下良性疾病肾切除术的经验。33例患有良性肾脏疾病的患者接受了腹腔镜肾切除术,其中23例采用TP途径,10例采用RP途径。两组患者的平均年龄、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分和标本重量相似。TP途径的平均手术时间为5.6小时,而RP途径为5小时。TP组和RP组的平均住院时间分别为2.8天和3天。两组术后镇痛药的使用情况相似(TP组和RP组分别相当于37毫克和39毫克硫酸吗啡)。然而,RP组恢复正常经口进食所需的时间比TP组少(0.3天对0.6天)。根据标本重量100克及以下进行评估时,RP组患者的术后镇痛需求显著降低(相当于11毫克硫酸吗啡,而TP组为28毫克硫酸吗啡)。在这一亚组患者中,RP组恢复经口进食也比TP组更快(0.4天对0.5天)。两组的住院时间和总康复时间相似。33例患者发生了4例并发症:2例患者(1例TP组和1例RP组)需要转为开放手术,1例身体虚弱的患者在接受TP途径手术时出现股外侧肌瘀伤,1例病态肥胖患者在TP途径手术失败后发生臂丛神经麻痹。腹腔镜肾切除术的RP途径可减少患者术后恢复正常经口进食的时间,对于标本较小的患者,可能会显著降低其术后镇痛需求。然而,与TP途径相比,用于良性疾病的腹腔镜肾切除术的RP途径并没有显著缩短住院时间或患者术后最终恢复正常活动的时间。RP途径的手术时间似乎确实有缩短的趋势。RP腹腔镜途径是我们治疗良性肾脏疾病患者的首选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验