Koyama E, Tanaka T, Chiba K, Kawakatsu S, Morinobu S, Totsuka S, Ishizaki T
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, International Medical Center of Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Aug;16(4):286-93. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199608000-00003.
The steady-state plasma concentrations of imipramine and desipramine were measured after a more than 2-week treatment with 0.39 to 1.39 mg/kg/day of imipramine hydrochloride in 28 Japanese patients with major depression who had been phenotyped simultaneously with mephenytoin (for CYP2C19-related status) and with metoprolol (for CYP2D6-related status) before initiating the antidepressant therapy. Patients consisted of five poor metabolizers (PMs) of CYP2C19 with an extensive metabolizer (EM) phenotype of CYP2D6, whereas the remainder were EMs for both of the phenotypes. The mean respective concentrations (corrected by mg/kg) of imipramine and the sum of imipramine plus desipramine were 2.4 and 1.8 times greater in the CYP2C19-related PM than in the EM group, and these two variables correlated with the log10 urinary excretion of 4'-hydroxymephenytoin (rs = -0.73 and -0.64, both p < 0.01, respectively), but not with the metabolic ratio (MR) of metoprolol/alpha-hydroxymetoprolol. The mean N-demethylation index (MR of desipramine/imipramine) was significantly (p < 0.01) less in the PM than in the EM group. This index correlated with the 4'-hydroxylation of S-mephenytoin (rs = -0.51, p < 0.01), but not with the alpha-hydroxylation of metoprolol, implying that imipramine N-demethylation is under a coregulatory pharmacogenetic control of CYP2C19, but not of CYP2D6. In conclusion, by taking into account that the incidence of the PMs of CYP2C19 is much greater (18-23%) than that of CYP2D6 (< 1%) in Japanese population, the individually predetermined assessment of the CYP2C19-mediated metabolic capacity of imipramine would be more valuable than that of the CYP2D6-mediated capacity for forecasting the steady-state concentrations of imipramine and desipramine in Japanese depressive patients, thereby attaining an individualized optimization of imipramine therapy. Obviously, a pharmacodynamic assessment study conducted simultaneously with predetermined CYP2C19 status is required for supporting this contention.
在28例日本重度抑郁症患者中,给予盐酸丙咪嗪0.39至1.39mg/kg/天,治疗超过2周后,测定丙咪嗪和地昔帕明的稳态血浆浓度。这些患者在开始抗抑郁治疗前,同时进行了美芬妥英(用于CYP2C19相关状态)和美托洛尔(用于CYP2D6相关状态)的表型分析。患者包括5例CYP2C19慢代谢者(PMs),其CYP2D6为广泛代谢者(EM)表型,其余患者两种表型均为EMs。与EM组相比,CYP2C19相关PMs中丙咪嗪的平均浓度(以mg/kg校正)以及丙咪嗪加地昔帕明的总和分别高2.4倍和1.8倍,这两个变量与4'-羟基美芬妥英的log10尿排泄量相关(rs分别为-0.73和-0.64,p均<0.01),但与美托洛尔/α-羟基美托洛尔的代谢率(MR)无关。PM组的平均N-去甲基化指数(地昔帕明/丙咪嗪的MR)显著低于EM组(p<0.01)。该指数与S-美芬妥英的4'-羟基化相关(rs=-0.51,p<0.01),但与美托洛尔的α-羟基化无关,这意味着丙咪嗪N-去甲基化受CYP2C19的共调节药物遗传学控制,而非CYP2D6。总之,考虑到在日本人群中CYP2C19的PMs发生率(18-23%)远高于CYP2D6(<1%),对于预测日本抑郁症患者丙咪嗪和地昔帕明的稳态浓度,预先单独评估CYP2C19介导的丙咪嗪代谢能力比评估CYP2D6介导的能力更有价值,从而实现丙咪嗪治疗的个体化优化。显然,需要同时进行与预先确定的CYP2C19状态相关的药效学评估研究来支持这一观点。