Suppr超能文献

小脑共济失调:多个关节间相互作用扭矩的异常控制。

Cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of interaction torques across multiple joints.

作者信息

Bastian A J, Martin T A, Keating J G, Thach W T

机构信息

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Irene Walter Johnson Institute of Rehabilitation Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1996 Jul;76(1):492-509. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.1.492.

Abstract
  1. We studied seven subjects with cerebellar lesions and seven control subjects as they made reaching movements in the sagittal plane to a target directly in front of them. Reaches were made under three different conditions: 1) "slow-accurate," 2) "fast-accurate," and 3) "fast as possible." All subjects were videotaped moving in a sagittal plane with markers on the index finger, wrist, elbow, and shoulder. Marker positions were digitized and then used to calculate joint angles. For each of the shoulder, elbow and wrist joints, inverse dynamics equations based on a three-segment limb model were used to estimate the net torque (sum of components) and each of the component torques. The component torques consisted of the torque due to gravity, the dynamic interaction torques induced passively by the movement of the adjacent joint, and the torque produced by the muscles and passive tissue elements (sometimes called "residual" torque). 2. A kinematic analysis of the movement trajectory and the change in joint angles showed that the reaches of subjects with cerebellar lesions were abnormal compared with reaches of control subjects. In both the slow-accurate and fast-accurate conditions the cerebellar subjects made abnormally curved wrist paths; the curvature was greater in the slow-accurate condition. During the slow-accurate condition, cerebellar subjects showed target undershoot and tended to move one joint at a time (decomposition). During the fast-accurate reaches, the cerebellar subjects showed target overshoot. Additionally, in the fast-accurate condition, cerebellar subjects moved the joints at abnormal rates relative to one another, but the movements were less decomposed. Only three subjects were tested in the fast as possible condition; this condition was analyzed only to determine maximal reaching speeds of subjects with cerebellar lesions. Cerebellar subjects moved more slowly than controls in all three conditions. 3. A kinetic analysis of torques generated at each joint during the slow-accurate reaches and the fast-accurate reaches revealed that subjects with cerebellar lesions produced very different torque profiles compared with control subjects. In the slow-accurate condition, the cerebellar subjects produced abnormal elbow muscle torques that prevented the normal elbow extension early in the reach. In the fast-accurate condition, the cerebellar subjects produced inappropriate levels of shoulder muscle torque and also produced elbow muscle torques that did not very appropriately with the dynamic interaction torques that occurred at the elbow. Lack of appropriate muscle torque resulted in excessive contributions of the dynamic interaction torque during the fast-accurate reaches. 4. The inability to produce muscle torques that predict, accommodate, and compensate for the dynamic interaction torques appears to be an important cause of the classic kinematic deficits shown by cerebellar subjects during attempted reaching. These kinematic deficits include incoordination of the shoulder and the elbow joints, a curved trajectory, and overshoot. In the fast-accurate condition, cerebellar subjects often made inappropriate muscle torques relative to the dynamic interaction torques. Because of this, interaction torques often determined the pattern of incoordination of the elbow and shoulder that produced the curved trajectory and target overshoot. In the slow-accurate condition, we reason that the cerebellar subjects may use a decomposition strategy so as to simplify the movement and not have to control both joints simultaneously. From these results, we suggest that a major role of the cerebellum is in generating muscle torques at a joint that will predict the interaction torques being generated by other moving joints and compensate for them as they occur.
摘要
  1. 我们研究了7名患有小脑损伤的受试者和7名对照受试者,他们在矢状面内朝着正前方的目标进行伸手动作。伸手动作在三种不同条件下进行:1)“缓慢而精确”,2)“快速而精确”,3)“尽可能快”。所有受试者在矢状面内移动时都被录像,食指、手腕、肘部和肩部都有标记。标记位置被数字化,然后用于计算关节角度。对于肩部、肘部和腕部的每个关节,基于三段肢体模型的逆动力学方程被用来估计净扭矩(各分量之和)以及每个分量扭矩。分量扭矩包括重力引起的扭矩、相邻关节运动被动诱发的动态相互作用扭矩,以及肌肉和被动组织元件产生的扭矩(有时称为“残余”扭矩)。2. 对运动轨迹和关节角度变化的运动学分析表明,与对照受试者的伸手动作相比,患有小脑损伤的受试者的伸手动作是异常的。在缓慢而精确和快速而精确的条件下,小脑损伤受试者的手腕路径都异常弯曲;在缓慢而精确的条件下曲率更大。在缓慢而精确的条件下,小脑损伤受试者表现出目标下冲,并且倾向于一次移动一个关节(分解动作)。在快速而精确的伸手动作中,小脑损伤受试者表现出目标上冲。此外,在快速而精确的条件下,小脑损伤受试者关节之间的运动速度异常,但动作分解较少。只有3名受试者在尽可能快的条件下接受了测试;分析这个条件只是为了确定患有小脑损伤的受试者的最大伸手速度。在所有三种条件下,小脑损伤受试者的动作都比对照组慢。3. 对缓慢而精确的伸手动作和快速而精确的伸手动作过程中每个关节产生的扭矩进行的动力学分析表明,与对照受试者相比,患有小脑损伤的受试者产生的扭矩曲线非常不同。在缓慢而精确的条件下,小脑损伤受试者产生异常的肘部肌肉扭矩,这在伸手动作早期阻止了肘部正常伸展。在快速而精确的条件下,小脑损伤受试者产生的肩部肌肉扭矩水平不合适,并且产生的肘部肌肉扭矩与肘部出现的动态相互作用扭矩不太匹配。在快速而精确的伸手动作中,缺乏适当的肌肉扭矩导致动态相互作用扭矩的贡献过大。4. 无法产生能够预测、适应和补偿动态相互作用扭矩的肌肉扭矩,似乎是小脑损伤受试者在尝试伸手时表现出的典型运动学缺陷的一个重要原因。这些运动学缺陷包括肩部和肘部关节不协调、轨迹弯曲和上冲。在快速而精确的条件下,小脑损伤受试者相对于动态相互作用扭矩经常产生不适当的肌肉扭矩。因此,相互作用扭矩常常决定了导致轨迹弯曲和目标上冲的肘部和肩部不协调模式。在缓慢而精确的条件下,我们推断小脑损伤受试者可能采用分解策略以便简化动作,而不必同时控制两个关节。从这些结果来看,我们认为小脑的一个主要作用是在一个关节处产生肌肉扭矩,该扭矩将预测其他运动关节产生的相互作用扭矩,并在它们出现时对其进行补偿。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验