Suppr超能文献

皮肤温暖感、热痛和深部冷痛期间人脑激活模式的比较。

Comparison of human cerebral activation pattern during cutaneous warmth, heat pain, and deep cold pain.

作者信息

Casey K L, Minoshima S, Morrow T J, Koeppe R A

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1996 Jul;76(1):571-81. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.1.571.

Abstract
  1. We wished to determine whether there are differences in the spatial pattern and intensity of synaptic activity within the conscious human forebrain when different forms and intensities of innocuous and noxious thermal stimuli are experienced. Accordingly, positron emission tomography (PET) with intravenous injection of H2(15)O was used to detect increases in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in normal humans as they discriminated differences in the intensity of noxious and innocuous thermal stimulation applied to the nondominant (left) arm. After stereotactic registration, subtraction images were formed from each subject by subtracting counts of emissions obtained during lower-intensity stimulation from those obtained during stimulation at higher intensities. A statistical summation analysis (Z score) of individual voxels was performed. In addition, volumes of interest were chosen on the basis of a priori hypotheses and the results of previously published PET studies. In both types of analysis, statistical thresholds were established with corrections for multiple comparisons. 2. Twenty-seven subjects were divided into three groups of nine subjects each for the three phases of this investigation. For studies in which repetitive contact heat stimuli were used, each subject was instructed in magnitude estimation on the basis of a scale for which 0 indicated "no heat sensation," 7 "just barely painful," and 10 "just barely tolerable." For the study of pain elicited by immersion of the hand in cold water, subjects were instructed to use a scale in which 0 represented "no pain" and 10 represented just barely tolerable pain. 3. In the warm-discrimination study, two intensities of innocuous heat (36 and 43 degrees C) were applied with a thermode as repetitive 5-s contacts to the volar forearm for a total of approximately 100 s, 8 stimuli before and 12 during each scan. Each temperature was applied on alternate scans for a total of four scans per subject. Neither stimulus was rated painful. All subjects discriminated the 43 degrees C stimulus (average rating 5.90 +/- 1.43, mean +/- SD) from the 36 degrees C stimulus (1.96 +/- 1.08, mean +/- SD; t = 13.19, P < 0.0001). Significant increases in rCBF to the 43 degrees C stimuli were found in the contralateral ventral posterior thalamus, lenticular nucleus, medial prefrontal cortex (Brodmann's areas 10 and 32), and cerebellar vermis. 4. The procedure for discriminating between noxious and innocuous heat stimuli was identical to that used for warm discrimination except that the stimulation temperatures were 40 and 50 degrees C. All subjects rated the 50 degrees C stimuli as painful (average rating 8.9 +/- 0.9, mean +/- SD) and the 40 degrees C stimuli as warm, but not painful (2.1 +/- 1.0). Significant rCBF increases to 50 degrees C stimuli were found contralaterally in the thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex, premotor cortex, and secondary somatosensory (S2) and posterior insular cortices. Significant activity also appeared within the region of the contralateral anterior insula and lenticular nucleus. The ipsilateral premotor cortex and thalamus, and the medial dorsal midbrain and cerebellar vermis, also showed significant rCBF increases. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) increases just below the threshold for statistical significance were seen in the contralateral sensorimotor cortex [primary motor cortex (M1)/primary somatosensory cortex (S1)]. 5. For discrimination between tonic innocuous cold and tonic cold pain, the left hand was immersed to the wrist, throughout each of six scans, in water kept at an average temperature of either 20.5 +/- 1.15 degrees C (mean +/- SD) or 6.02 +/- 1.18 degrees C (mean +/- SD) on alternate scans. All subjects rated the intensity of the stimuli on a scale in which 0 indicated no pain and 10 represented barely tolerable pain. Subjects rated the 20 degrees C water immersion as painless (average rating 0.18 +/- 0.48, mean +/- SD), but gave ratings indicating i
摘要
  1. 我们希望确定,当人体感受不同形式和强度的无害及有害热刺激时,清醒状态下人类前脑内突触活动的空间模式和强度是否存在差异。因此,我们采用静脉注射H2(15)O的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)技术,检测正常人类在辨别施加于非优势(左)手臂的有害及无害热刺激强度差异时,局部脑血流(rCBF)的增加情况。在立体定向配准后,通过从每个受试者较高强度刺激期间获得的发射计数中减去较低强度刺激期间获得的发射计数,形成减法图像。对各个体素进行统计求和分析(Z评分)。此外,根据先验假设和先前发表的PET研究结果选择感兴趣的区域。在这两种分析中,均通过多重比较校正来确定统计阈值。2. 27名受试者被分为三组,每组9名,用于本研究的三个阶段。在使用重复性接触热刺激的研究中,指导每个受试者根据一个量表进行量级估计,该量表中0表示“无热感”,7表示“刚有一点痛”,10表示“勉强可耐受”。在研究将手浸入冷水中引发的疼痛时,指导受试者使用一个量表,其中0表示“无疼痛”,10表示勉强可耐受的疼痛。3. 在温觉辨别研究中,用一个热电极以重复性5秒接触的方式,将两种强度的无害热(36和43摄氏度)施加于掌侧前臂,每次扫描前有8次刺激,扫描期间有12次刺激,总共约100秒。每个温度在交替扫描时施加,每个受试者总共进行4次扫描。两种刺激均未被评为疼痛。所有受试者都能区分43摄氏度的刺激(平均评分为5.90±1.43,均值±标准差)和36摄氏度的刺激(1.96±1.08,均值±标准差;t = 13.19,P < 0.0001)。在对侧腹后丘脑、豆状核、内侧前额叶皮质(布罗德曼区10和32)以及小脑蚓部,发现43摄氏度刺激引起rCBF显著增加。4. 区分有害和无害热刺激的程序与温觉辨别所用程序相同,只是刺激温度为40和50摄氏度。所有受试者将50摄氏度的刺激评为疼痛(平均评分为8.9±0.9,均值±标准差),将40摄氏度的刺激评为温热但不疼痛(2.1±1.0)。在对侧丘脑、前扣带回皮质、运动前皮质、次级躯体感觉(S2)和岛叶后皮质中,发现50摄氏度刺激引起rCBF显著增加。在对侧前岛叶和豆状核区域也出现了显著活动。同侧运动前皮质和丘脑,以及内侧背侧中脑和小脑蚓部,也显示rCBF显著增加。在对侧感觉运动皮质[初级运动皮质(M1)/初级躯体感觉皮质(S1)]中,可见略低于统计学显著性阈值的脑血流(CBF)增加。5. 为了区分持续性无害冷觉和持续性冷痛,在六次扫描的每次扫描中,将左手浸入平均温度为20.5±1.15摄氏度(均值±标准差)或6.02±1.18摄氏度(均值±标准差)的水中至手腕,交替扫描。所有受试者根据一个量表对刺激强度进行评分,其中0表示无疼痛,10表示勉强可耐受的疼痛。受试者将20摄氏度的水浸评为无痛(平均评分为0.18±0.48,均值±标准差),但给出的评分表明……

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验