Suppr超能文献

高通胀压力和呼气末正压。对肺有害吗?不。

High-inflation pressure and positive end-expiratory pressure. Injurious to the lung? No.

作者信息

Nelson L D

机构信息

Department of Surgical Education, Orlando Regional Healthcare System, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Clin. 1996 Jul;12(3):603-25. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70265-7.

Abstract

Survival rates in ARDS with conventional ventilation using high oxygen fractions and low PEEP levels have been reported to be less than 10%. In three prospective evaluations of ARDS in the 1980s, mortality rates remained greater than 60%. Early studies using high-level PEEP therapy in severe ARDS by Douglas, Downs, Kirby, and Civetta showed improved survival rates with ranges between 60% and 80%. In 1979 Gallagher reviewed 59 patients with ARDS who were treated with PEEP greater than 15 cm H2O titrated to improve FRC by achieving an intrapulmonary shunt fraction of 15%. The overall survival was 65%, with only 5% of the patients dying secondary to respiratory failure. In the more recent study by Miller in trauma patients and later by DiRusso in a variety of surgical patients, the overall mortality rate for those patients receiving PEEP greater than 15 cm H2O was 20% to 30%. Of the 14 patients who died, only seven (10% of the total) succumbed to respiratory failure. The remaining patients died from the primary underlying disease with normal oxygenation or after significant weaning from high PEEP levels. By using a goal-oriented approach to the management of patients with severe ARDS, we have found that high-level PEEP therapy was effective in lowering the intrapulmonary shunt and improving the SaO2 at acceptable levels of inspired oxygen. All of these patients were ventilated with traditional high tidal volumes (10 to 15 mL/kg) and therefore exhibited high peak inspiratory airway pressures. This support method did not seem to cause lung injury or an excessive amount of barotrauma in these patients, but in fact, was associated with a lower mortality rate (30%) than reported in other studies of patients with lesser degrees of lung oxygenation dysfunction and extrapulmonary organ system dysfunction. Currently available information indicates that increases in mean airway pressure (induced with PEEP or other modes of ventilatory support to restore losses in FRC that occur during ARDS) and limiting exposure to toxic concentrations of oxygen minimize ventilator-induced secondary lung injury and maximize chances for survival. Arbitrary limitations of peak inspiratory or end-expiratory airway pressure or mandatory tidal volume in patients with severe ARDS seem to be unfounded. Failure to achieve adequate physiologic end-points in these patients may increase morbidity and mortality rates.

摘要

据报道,采用高氧浓度和低呼气末正压(PEEP)水平的传统通气方式治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)时,生存率低于10%。在20世纪80年代对ARDS进行的三项前瞻性评估中,死亡率仍高于60%。Douglas、Downs、Kirby和Civetta在早期对重症ARDS患者采用高水平PEEP治疗的研究中发现,生存率有所提高,范围在60%至80%之间。1979年,Gallagher回顾了59例接受PEEP大于15 cm H₂O治疗的ARDS患者,通过调整PEEP使肺内分流分数达到15%来改善功能残气量(FRC)。总体生存率为65%,仅有5%的患者死于呼吸衰竭。在Miller对创伤患者以及后来DiRusso对各种外科手术患者进行的近期研究中,接受PEEP大于15 cm H₂O治疗的患者总体死亡率为20%至30%。在死亡的14例患者中,只有7例(占总数的10%)死于呼吸衰竭。其余患者死于原发性基础疾病,氧合正常或在从高水平PEEP显著撤机后死亡。通过采用目标导向的方法来管理重症ARDS患者,我们发现高水平PEEP治疗在可接受的吸入氧水平下,能有效降低肺内分流并提高动脉血氧饱和度(SaO₂)。所有这些患者均采用传统的高潮气量(10至15 mL/kg)进行通气,因此吸气末气道压力峰值较高。这种支持方法似乎并未在这些患者中导致肺损伤或过多的气压伤,事实上,与其他对肺氧合功能障碍和肺外器官系统功能障碍程度较轻的患者的研究相比,其死亡率更低(30%)。目前可得的信息表明,增加平均气道压力(通过PEEP或其他通气支持模式诱导,以恢复ARDS期间发生的FRC损失)并限制暴露于有毒浓度的氧气,可将呼吸机诱发的继发性肺损伤降至最低,并使生存机会最大化。对重症ARDS患者随意限制吸气末或呼气末气道压力或强制潮气量似乎是没有根据的。在这些患者中未能达到足够的生理终点可能会增加发病率和死亡率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验