Crook B, Kitson D, McComish M, Jewitt D
Br Heart J. 1977 Jul;39(7):771-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.39.7.771.
Clinical recognition of sinoatrial disease currently depends on the presence of transient sinus bradycardia, sinoatrial block, or supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. The value of clinical electrophysiological assessment in these patients is not clear. Using intracardiac electrophysiological recordings and programmed stimulation we have examined 14 patients with sinoatrial disease and 11 control patients undergoing investigation for chest pain. Intracardiac conduction times were normal in all patients. There was no significant difference of sinus node recovery times between the sinoatrial disease and control groups. Sinoatrial conduction times were measured by the indirect method and two populations were identified. However, the mean values of 128 +/- 27 ms in patients and 112 +/- 30 ms in controls were not significantly different and major overlap rendered this measurement clinically valueless. It is concluded that no current electrophysiological measurement has diagnostic value in patients with sinoatrial disease.
目前,窦房结疾病的临床诊断依赖于短暂性窦性心动过缓、窦房传导阻滞或室上性快速性心律失常的存在。临床电生理评估在这些患者中的价值尚不清楚。我们使用心内电生理记录和程控刺激,对14例窦房结疾病患者和11例因胸痛接受检查的对照患者进行了研究。所有患者的心内传导时间均正常。窦房结疾病组和对照组的窦房结恢复时间无显著差异。采用间接法测量窦房传导时间,并识别出两类人群。然而,患者组的平均值为128±27毫秒,对照组为112±30毫秒,差异无统计学意义,且大部分重叠使得该测量在临床上无价值。得出的结论是,目前没有电生理测量方法对窦房结疾病患者具有诊断价值。