Suppr超能文献

在埃及E型肉毒中毒暴发期间使用一种研究性马源F(ab')2七价肉毒中毒免疫球蛋白的经验。

Experience with the use of an investigational F(ab')2 heptavalent botulism immune globulin of equine origin during an outbreak of type E botulism in Egypt.

作者信息

Hibbs R G, Weber J T, Corwin A, Allos B M, Abd el Rehim M S, Sharkawy S E, Sarn J E, McKee K T

机构信息

U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Aug;23(2):337-40. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.2.337.

Abstract

During an outbreak of type E foodborne botulism in Cairo in 1991, an investigational equine F(ab')2 "despeciated" heptavalent botulism immune globulin (dBIG) was provided to the Egyptian Ministry of Health by the U.S. Army. Of 54 patients known to have been treated with antitoxins, 4 received commercially available trivalent antitoxins, 45 received dBIG, and 5 received both commercial antitoxin and dBIG. Physicians recorded side effects in 10 (22%) of 45 patients who received dBIG; in nine cases, reactions were considered "mild," and in one case they were believed to be serum sickness. In contrast, possible serum sickness during hospitalization was recorded for two of four patients who were receiving commercial antitoxins. No complications of therapy were noted for any patient who was receiving both antitoxin types. In a separate study, 31 patients were contacted about their reactions to the antitoxin by telephone after discharge from the hospital. Seven (54%) of 13 patients attributed symptoms that they experienced while they were hospitalized to receipt of dBIG, while four (44%) of nine patients who indicated that they had received commercial antitoxins and one (20%) of five who received both commercial antitoxin and dBIG reported side effects before discharge. Data on the efficacy of the antitoxins were not obtained. In our experience, equine dBIG was at least as safe as commercially available antitoxins in treating type E foodborne botulism.

摘要

1991年开罗发生E型食源性肉毒中毒疫情期间,美国陆军向埃及卫生部提供了一种试验性马源F(ab')2“去特异性”七价肉毒中毒免疫球蛋白(dBIG)。在已知接受抗毒素治疗的54名患者中,4人接受了市售三价抗毒素,45人接受了dBIG,5人同时接受了市售抗毒素和dBIG。医生记录了45名接受dBIG治疗患者中的10人(22%)出现副作用;9例反应被认为“轻微”,1例被认为是血清病。相比之下,接受市售抗毒素治疗的4名患者中有2人在住院期间记录到可能的血清病。接受两种抗毒素治疗的患者均未出现治疗并发症。在另一项研究中,31名患者出院后通过电话联系询问他们对抗毒素的反应。13名接受dBIG治疗的患者中有7人(54%)将住院期间出现的症状归因于接受dBIG,而9名表示接受市售抗毒素治疗的患者中有4人(44%)以及5名同时接受市售抗毒素和dBIG治疗的患者中有1人(20%)报告在出院前出现了副作用。未获得抗毒素疗效的数据。根据我们的经验,在治疗E型食源性肉毒中毒方面,马源dBIG至少与市售抗毒素一样安全。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验