Wasan K M, Conklin J S
Division of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Aug;40(8):1806-10. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.8.1806.
Since fungal infections are prevalent in diabetic patients, in whom treatment is often complicated by underlying renal disease and dyslipidemias, the purpose of the present study was to determine if the antifungal activity and nephrotoxic effects of amphotericin B (AmB) and liposomal AmB (L-AmB) are different in nondiabetic (normolipidemic) rats compared with those in diabetic (dyslipidemic) rats with systemic candidiasis. Non diabetic and diabetic rats infected with Candida albicans received a single intravenous dose of either AmB (0.8 mg of AmB per kg of body weight), L-AmB (0.8, 2, or 4 mg of AmB per kg), or an equivalent volume of normal saline (1 ml). Renal function was assessed by insulin clearance, and antifungal activity was determined by measuring the numbers of CFU of C. albicans that were present in the right kidney following drug treatment. AmB at 0.8 mg/kg and L-AmB at 0.8, 2, and 4 mg/kg are effective antifungal agents in both diabetic and nondiabetic rats. However, while there was approximately a 4-fold decline in the mean number of CFU per gram of kidney in nondiabetic rats, there was only approximately a 2.5-fold decline for the comparable dose (AmB, 0.8 mg/kg) in diabetic rats. There also appeared to be a similar fold reduction of L-AmB at all of the dosages tested. AmB treatment significantly improved renal function in diabetic and nondiabetic rats with systemic candidiasis. Although L-AmB at all doses tested significantly improved renal function in diabetic rats with systemic candidiasis, only L-AmB at doses of 2 and 4 mg/kg significantly improved renal function in nondiabetic rats with systemic candidiasis. These findings suggest that following administration of a single intravenous dose, AmB and L-AmB appear to be less effective in killing C. albicans isolates in diabetic than in nondiabetic rats, while they were found to improve the renal functions of rats in both treatment groups.
由于真菌感染在糖尿病患者中很普遍,而糖尿病患者的治疗常因潜在的肾脏疾病和血脂异常而变得复杂,本研究的目的是确定两性霉素B(AmB)和脂质体两性霉素B(L-AmB)在患有系统性念珠菌病的非糖尿病(血脂正常)大鼠与糖尿病(血脂异常)大鼠中的抗真菌活性和肾毒性作用是否不同。感染白色念珠菌的非糖尿病和糖尿病大鼠接受单次静脉注射AmB(每千克体重0.8毫克AmB)、L-AmB(每千克体重0.8、2或4毫克AmB)或等量的生理盐水(1毫升)。通过胰岛素清除率评估肾功能,并通过测量药物治疗后右肾中白色念珠菌的CFU数量来确定抗真菌活性。0.8毫克/千克的AmB和0.8、2和4毫克/千克的L-AmB在糖尿病和非糖尿病大鼠中都是有效的抗真菌剂。然而,非糖尿病大鼠每克肾脏中CFU的平均数下降了约4倍,而糖尿病大鼠中相同剂量(AmB,0.8毫克/千克)的CFU平均数仅下降了约2.5倍。在所有测试剂量下,L-AmB的下降倍数似乎也相似。AmB治疗显著改善了患有系统性念珠菌病的糖尿病和非糖尿病大鼠的肾功能。虽然所有测试剂量的L-AmB都显著改善了患有系统性念珠菌病的糖尿病大鼠的肾功能,但只有2和4毫克/千克剂量的L-AmB显著改善了患有系统性念珠菌病的非糖尿病大鼠的肾功能。这些发现表明,单次静脉注射后,AmB和L-AmB在杀死糖尿病大鼠中的白色念珠菌分离株方面似乎比非糖尿病大鼠效果更差,而在两个治疗组中它们都能改善大鼠的肾功能。