Grimaud J, Lai M, Thorpe J, Adeleine P, Wang L, Barker G J, Plummer D L, Tofts P S, McDonald W I, Miller D H
NMR Research Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;14(5):495-505. doi: 10.1016/0730-725x(96)00018-5.
Several computer-assisted techniques for measuring multiple sclerosis lesion load on MR images have been developed to provide a quantitative and sensitive means for monitoring disease activity, particularly in the context of treatment trials. We have evaluated three techniques: manual outlining (similar to that of the North American interferon beta-1b trial), semiautomated lesion contouring (local lesion based threshold), and intensity-based thresholding for the whole brain. Contiguous, 5 mm-thick, axial, T2-weighted images of the brain were obtained on a 1.5T MR imager in eight patients with clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Analyses of the scans were performed twice, independently by three operators, using the three different techniques. The coefficient of variation of the measurement techniques was: (a) intrarater precision, 9.0 +/- 5.2 (mean +/- SD) (range 0.4-18.5) for the manual outlining, 2.5 +/- 2.1 (0.1-7.7) for the contour technique, and 7.5 +/- 6.9 (0.2-22.0) for the global threshold technique; (b) interrater precision, 11.0 +/- 5.8 (4.9-21.7) for the manual outlining, 4.5 +/- 1.6 (1.8-6.6) for the contour technique, and 11.4 +/- 4.9 (2.8-19.2) for the global threshold technique (0.0 = perfect precision). The absolute lesion loads measured were very similar using the manual outlining and the contour techniques but were significantly smaller using the global threshold technique. We conclude that the contour technique is a promising tool for use in treatment trials. Further studies are needed to assess sensitivity to changes in lesion load over time.
已经开发了几种用于在磁共振成像(MR)图像上测量多发性硬化症病变负荷的计算机辅助技术,以提供一种定量且灵敏的手段来监测疾病活动,尤其是在治疗试验的背景下。我们评估了三种技术:手动勾勒(类似于北美干扰素β-1b试验)、半自动病变轮廓勾勒(基于局部病变的阈值)以及全脑基于强度的阈值设定。在一台1.5T MR成像仪上,对8例临床确诊的多发性硬化症患者获取了连续的、5毫米厚的轴向T2加权脑图像。由三名操作人员分别使用三种不同技术对扫描图像进行两次独立分析。测量技术的变异系数为:(a)同一操作人员内部精度,手动勾勒为9.0±5.2(均值±标准差)(范围0.4 - 18.5),轮廓技术为2.5±2.1(0.1 - 7.7),全局阈值技术为7.5±6.9(0.2 - 22.0);(b)不同操作人员之间的精度,手动勾勒为11.0±5.8(4.9 - 21.7),轮廓技术为4.5±1.6(1.8 - 6.6),全局阈值技术为11.4±4.9(2.8 - 19.2)(0.0表示完美精度)。使用手动勾勒和轮廓技术测量的绝对病变负荷非常相似,但使用全局阈值技术时明显较小。我们得出结论,轮廓技术是用于治疗试验的一种有前景的工具。需要进一步研究来评估其对病变负荷随时间变化的敏感性。