Sauerborn R, Adams A, Hien M
Harvard Institute for International Development, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Aug;43(3):291-301. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00375-4.
The authors examine the strategies rural households in Burkina Faso used to cope with the costs of illness in order to avert negative effects for household production and assets. They use information from 51 qualitative interviews, a household time allocation study and a household survey. Both surveys use the same sample of n = 566 households. The authors analyze these strategies along four dimensions: the type of behavior, the sequence in which strategies employed, the level at which strategies are negotiated, i.e. the household level, the non-household extended kin level or the community level, and finally the success of strategies in protecting household production and assets. A taxonomy of 11 distinct types of coping behavior is developed which have the effect of either avoiding costs by 'ignoring' disease, or of minimizing the impact of costs on the household once illness is perceived. Intra-household labor substitution was the main strategy to compensate for any labor lost to illness. However, labor substitution did not eliminate production losses in the majority of households struck with severe illness of a productive member. Only wealthy household were able to fully compensate labor losses by hiring labor or by investing in equipment to enhance productivity. Sales of livestock was the main strategy to cope with the financial costs of health care. None of the households studied fell into calamity. However, the households' ability to avert the loss of production and/or assets was very varied and depended on household size, composition and assets, on the type and duration of illness and on clustering of crises (e.g. several repetitive or simultaneous illnesses or concurrent seasonal stress). Coping with the costs of illness largely occurred at the level of the household. Inter-household transfers of resources played only a small role. The authors develop the concept of risk households and suggest several policies with the potential to strengthen the ability of households to cope with the economic costs of illness.
作者研究了布基纳法索农村家庭为应对疾病成本而采取的策略,以避免对家庭生产和资产产生负面影响。他们使用了来自51次定性访谈、一项家庭时间分配研究和一项家庭调查的信息。两项调查都使用了n = 566户家庭的相同样本。作者从四个维度分析了这些策略:行为类型、采用策略的顺序、协商策略的层面,即家庭层面、非家庭的亲属层面或社区层面,以及最后策略在保护家庭生产和资产方面的成功程度。作者制定了11种不同应对行为的分类法,这些行为要么通过“忽视”疾病来避免成本,要么在察觉到疾病后将成本对家庭的影响降至最低。家庭内部的劳动力替代是弥补因病损失的劳动力的主要策略。然而,在大多数有生产能力的成员患重病的家庭中,劳动力替代并不能消除生产损失。只有富裕家庭能够通过雇佣劳动力或投资设备提高生产力来完全弥补劳动力损失。出售牲畜是应对医疗保健财务成本的主要策略。所研究的家庭没有一家陷入灾难。然而,家庭避免生产和/或资产损失的能力差异很大,这取决于家庭规模、构成和资产、疾病类型和持续时间以及危机的聚集情况(例如,几种反复出现或同时发生的疾病或并发的季节性压力)。应对疾病成本主要在家庭层面进行。家庭间的资源转移只起到了很小的作用。作者提出了风险家庭的概念,并建议了几项有可能增强家庭应对疾病经济成本能力的政策。