Quintussi Marta, Van de Poel Ellen, Panda Pradeep, Rutten Frans
Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 26;15:179. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0833-0.
As compared to other countries in South East Asia, India's health care system is characterized by very high out of pocket payments, and consequently low financial protection and access to care. This paper describes the relative importance of ill-health compared to other adverse events, the conduits through which ill-health affects household welfare and the coping strategies used to finance these expenses.
Cross-sectional data are used from a survey conducted with 5241 households in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar in 2010 that included a household shocks module and detailed information about health care use and spending.
Health-related adverse events were the second most common adverse events (34%), after natural disasters (51%). Crop and livestock disease and weddings each affected about 8% of households. Only a fourth of households reported to have recovered from illness and/or death in the family (by the time of the survey). Most of the households' economic burden related to ill-health was depending on direct medical costs, but indirect costs (such as lost earnings and transportation or food costs) were also not negligible. Close to half of the health expenditures were made for chronic conditions. Households tried to cope with health-related expenditures mostly by dissaving, borrowing and selling assets. Few households reported having to reduce (food) consumption in response to ill-health.
In the absence of pre-financing schemes, ill-health events pose a substantial threat to household welfare in rural India. While most households seem to be able to smooth consumption in the short term, coping strategies like selling assets and borrowing from moneylenders are likely to have severe long term consequences. As most of the households' economic risk related to ill-health appears to depend on out of pocket spending, introducing health insurance may contribute significantly to alleviate economic hardship for families in rural India. The importance of care for chronic diseases, however, represents a big challenge for the sustainability of community based health insurance schemes, since it is necessary to ensure a sufficient degree of risk pooling.
与东南亚其他国家相比,印度的医疗保健系统具有自付费用非常高的特点,因此财务保护水平低且获得医疗服务的机会有限。本文描述了健康不佳与其他不良事件相比的相对重要性、健康不佳影响家庭福利的途径以及用于支付这些费用的应对策略。
采用2010年在北方邦和比哈尔邦对5241户家庭进行的一项调查中的横断面数据,该调查包括家庭冲击模块以及有关医疗保健使用和支出的详细信息。
与健康相关的不良事件是第二常见的不良事件(34%),仅次于自然灾害(51%)。作物和牲畜疾病以及婚礼分别影响了约8%的家庭。只有四分之一的家庭报告称(在调查时)家庭中的疾病和/或死亡已康复。大多数家庭与健康不佳相关的经济负担取决于直接医疗费用,但间接费用(如收入损失以及交通或食品费用)也不可忽视。近一半的医疗支出用于慢性病。家庭主要通过动用储蓄、借贷和出售资产来应对与健康相关的支出。很少有家庭报告因健康不佳而不得不减少(食品)消费。
在缺乏预筹资计划的情况下,健康不佳事件对印度农村家庭福利构成重大威胁。虽然大多数家庭似乎能够在短期内维持消费平稳,但出售资产和向放债人借贷等应对策略可能会产生严重的长期后果。由于大多数家庭与健康不佳相关的经济风险似乎取决于自付费用,引入医疗保险可能会极大地有助于减轻印度农村家庭的经济困难。然而,慢性病护理的重要性对基于社区的医疗保险计划的可持续性构成了重大挑战,因为有必要确保足够程度的风险共担。