Akafo S K, Thompson J R, Rosenthal A R
University of Leicester School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, England.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 1995 Jul-Sep;5(3):172-6. doi: 10.1177/112067219500500305.
The intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering efficacy of once-daily levobunolol 0.5% was compared with timolol 0.5% twice-daily and timolol 0.5% once-daily in 20 chronic open angle glaucoma and 5 ocular hypertensive patients. The design used was a randomised double blind cross-over trial with three periods each of 8 weeks separated by 2 weeks of no treatment. We found that following levobunolol a two week washout was not sufficient for the IOP to return to its original baseline level suggesting that levobunolol is a longer acting drug than timolol. Adjusting for this carryover effect, we found on significant difference in the IOP lowering effect among the three regimes (p = 0.53). Reduced cost, less ocular discomfort and better compliance are the main potential advantages of the once daily treatments.
在20例慢性开角型青光眼患者和5例高眼压症患者中,比较了每日一次使用0.5%左布诺洛尔、每日两次使用0.5%噻吗洛尔以及每日一次使用0.5%噻吗洛尔降低眼压(IOP)的疗效。采用的设计是随机双盲交叉试验,共三个阶段,每个阶段8周,中间间隔2周不进行治疗。我们发现,在使用左布诺洛尔后,两周的洗脱期不足以使眼压恢复到原来的基线水平,这表明左布诺洛尔比噻吗洛尔作用时间更长。校正这种残留效应后,我们发现三种治疗方案在降低眼压效果上无显著差异(p = 0.53)。每日一次治疗的主要潜在优势在于成本降低、眼部不适减少以及依从性更好。