Litt M D, Nye C, Shafer D
University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, USA.
J Behav Med. 1995 Oct;18(5):435-59. doi: 10.1007/BF01904773.
Third-molar extraction patients (N = 231) underwent one of five preparatory interventions offering different levels of relaxation, control, and self-efficacy to evaluate the relative importance of each of these elements of coping in the context of an acute stressor. Prior to surgery subjects completed measures of monitoring and blunting. Results indicated that relaxation, perceived control, and self-efficacy were each significant, and roughly equivalent, contributors to coping, and operated in an additive way. Intervention type, and the interaction of intervention type with blunting score, significantly predicted distress prior to and during surgery. It was concluded that no single element is crucial to effective coping and that interventions that provide more coping elements are generally superior. Additionally, the interaction of coping style with intervention is as strong a contributor to coping outcome as the other factors. Those who prefer to distract themselves may benefit most from interventions that require the least possible personal investment of effort and attention.
231名拔除第三磨牙的患者接受了五种预备干预措施中的一种,这些措施提供了不同程度的放松、控制感和自我效能感,以评估在急性应激源背景下应对的每个要素的相对重要性。手术前,受试者完成了监测和钝感测量。结果表明,放松、感知到的控制感和自我效能感都是应对的重要且大致相当的因素,并以累加方式起作用。干预类型以及干预类型与钝感得分的相互作用,显著预测了手术前和手术期间的痛苦程度。研究得出结论,没有单一要素对有效应对至关重要,提供更多应对要素的干预措施通常更具优势。此外,应对方式与干预的相互作用对应对结果的影响与其他因素一样大。那些喜欢分散自己注意力的人可能从需要最少个人精力和注意力投入的干预措施中获益最大。