Jacolot A, Tod M, Petitjean O
Département de Pharmacotoxicologie, Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Apr;40(4):979-82. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.4.979.
The pharmacokinetic interaction between cefdinir and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (captopril or quinapril) was investigated in rats. The linearity of cefdinir pharmacokinetics was demonstrated in three groups of rats receiving 10, 20, or 40 mg of cefdinir per kg of body weight intravenously. Then, three other groups of rats were established as follows: group 1 (n = 5) received cefdinir (10 mg/kg) intravenously, and 12 blood samples per rat were drawn between 0 and 8 h after injection of the dose; group 2 (n = 5) was treated in the same way as group 1, but captopril (0.8 mg/kg) was coadministered by intraintestinal injection into all animals; group 3 (n = 6) was treated in the same way as group 2, but quinapril (0.8 mg/kg) replaced captopril. Plasma cefdinir concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography, and the data were analyzed by a noncompartmental method. Finally, three groups of four or five rats each were set up as described above, but the cefdinir dose was 20 mg/kg and the animals were sacrificed 1 h after drug injection to collect blood to determine the unbound cefdinir fraction (fu) by ultrafiltration. The angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors increased the mean cefdinir area under the concentration-time curve up to 8 h by a factor of 1.8 (captopril; P < 0.05) and a factor of 3.5 (quinapril; P < 0.05). With captopril, mean cefdinir clearance was decreased by a factor of 2, and the volume of distribution increased by the same factor, while the fu increased from 15.4% +/- 3.0% (cefdinir alone) to 22.8% +/- 10.9% (cefdinir plus captopril). Captopril increased the cefdinir half-life from 0.62 +/- 0.17 to 2.92 +/- 0.95 h. With quinapril, the interaction was so strong that no elimination phase was detectable in four of the six rats, and therefore, no pharmacokinetic parameter values other than the cefdinir fu could be calculated; the cefdinir fu increased to 25.1% +/- 11.1%. It is concluded that captopril and quinapril (and/or their metabolites) have a major impact on the disposition of cefdinir in rats, probably by competition at the plasma protein-binding level and at the tubular anionic carrier level. This latter mechanism should also be relevant in humans.
在大鼠中研究了头孢地尼与一种血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(卡托普利或喹那普利)之间的药代动力学相互作用。在三组分别静脉注射每千克体重10、20或40毫克头孢地尼的大鼠中证实了头孢地尼药代动力学的线性关系。然后,另外建立了三组大鼠如下:第1组(n = 5)静脉注射头孢地尼(10毫克/千克),在注射剂量后的0至8小时内,每只大鼠采集12份血样;第2组(n = 5)与第1组处理方式相同,但所有动物通过肠内注射同时给予卡托普利(0.8毫克/千克);第3组(n = 6)与第2组处理方式相同,但用喹那普利(0.8毫克/千克)替代卡托普利。通过液相色谱法测定血浆头孢地尼浓度,并采用非房室方法分析数据。最后,如上所述每组设置四五只大鼠,但头孢地尼剂量为20毫克/千克,在药物注射后1小时处死动物采集血液,通过超滤法测定游离头孢地尼分数(fu)。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂使头孢地尼浓度 - 时间曲线下面积(至8小时)平均增加了1.8倍(卡托普利;P < 0.05)和3.5倍(喹那普利;P < 0.05)。使用卡托普利时,头孢地尼平均清除率降低了2倍,分布容积增加了相同倍数,而fu从15.4% ± 3.0%(单独使用头孢地尼)增加到22.8% ± [具体数值缺失](头孢地尼加卡托普利)。卡托普利使头孢地尼半衰期从0.62 ± 0.17小时增加到2.92 ± 0.95小时。使用喹那普利时,相互作用非常强烈,六只大鼠中有四只未检测到消除相,因此,除了头孢地尼fu外,无法计算其他药代动力学参数值;头孢地尼fu增加到25.1% ± 11.1%。结论是卡托普利和喹那普利(和/或它们的代谢产物)对大鼠体内头孢地尼的处置有重大影响,可能是通过在血浆蛋白结合水平和肾小管阴离子载体水平的竞争。后一种机制在人类中可能也有相关性。 (注:原文中“22.8% ± [具体数值缺失]”处可能存在信息遗漏,翻译时保留原文格式)