• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Differential renal handling of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors enalaprilat and lisinopril in rats.

作者信息

Lin J H, Chen I W, Ulm E H, Duggan D E

机构信息

Department of Drug Metabolism, Merck Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories, West Point, PA 19486.

出版信息

Drug Metab Dispos. 1988 May-Jun;16(3):392-6.

PMID:2900730
Abstract

Enalaprilat, the active metabolite of enalapril, and its lysine analogue lisinopril are potent nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Earlier studies from our laboratories demonstrated that neither drug is significantly metabolized, and both are almost exclusively eliminated by renal excretion. This report compares the renal excretory mechanisms for these structurally related compounds in the rat. After an iv, 1-mg/kg dose, ratios of renal clearance (CLR) of unbound drug to glomerular filtration rate (GFR) for enalaprilat and lisinopril were 2.72 +/- 0.70 and 1.01 +/- 0.18, respectively, suggesting that enalaprilat, but not lisinopril, was actively secreted by the kidneys. Treatment with probenecid and p-aminohippuric acid, potent competitive inhibitors for the renal anionic transport system, caused a profound decrease in the renal clearance of enalaprilat to the level of GFR. The CLR/fu.GFR, where fu is the unbound fraction, became 1.10 +/- 0.09 and 1.25 +/- 0.25, respectively. These results and the fact that quinine, a potent inhibitor for the cationic transport system, had little effect on the renal clearance of enalaprilat indicated that enalaprilat is secreted by the organic anion transport system. On the other hand, probenecid, p-aminohippuric acid, and quinine had no effect on the renal clearance of lisinopril, suggesting that lisinopril is eliminated exclusively by glomerular filtration.

摘要

相似文献

1
Differential renal handling of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors enalaprilat and lisinopril in rats.
Drug Metab Dispos. 1988 May-Jun;16(3):392-6.
2
Renal handling of enalapril and enalaprilat: studies in the isolated red blood cell-perfused rat kidney.依那普利和依那普利拉的肾脏处理:对分离的红细胞灌注大鼠肾脏的研究。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1989 Dec;251(3):1211-22.
3
Kinetic and metabolic aspects of enalapril action.
J Hypertens Suppl. 1984 Dec;2(2):S37-42.
4
Kinetic studies on the competition between famotidine and cimetidine in rats. Evidence of multiple renal secretory systems for organic cations.法莫替丁与西咪替丁在大鼠体内竞争的动力学研究。有机阳离子多种肾脏分泌系统的证据。
Drug Metab Dispos. 1988 Jan-Feb;16(1):52-6.
5
The angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril and its effects on renal function.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂依那普利及其对肾功能的影响。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1983 Oct;1(1):93-7.
6
Inhibition of esterolysis of enalapril by paraoxon increases the urinary clearance in isolated perfused rat kidney.
Drug Metab Dispos. 1999 Aug;27(8):931-6.
7
Intracellular and not intraluminal esterolysis of enalapril in kidney. Studies with the single pass perfused nonfiltering rat kidney.
Drug Metab Dispos. 1998 Apr;26(4):324-31.
8
Renal handling of alendronate in rats. An uncharacterized renal transport system.
Drug Metab Dispos. 1992 Jul-Aug;20(4):608-13.
9
Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lisinopril and enalapril, alone and in combination with propranolol.赖诺普利和依那普利单独使用及与普萘洛尔联合使用时的比较药代动力学和药效学
J Hum Hypertens. 1989 Jun;3 Suppl 1:139-45.
10
High serum enalaprilat in chronic renal failure.慢性肾衰竭患者血清依那普利拉水平升高。
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2001 Dec;2(4):240-5. doi: 10.3317/jraas.2001.038.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Lisinopril in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Patients: Implications for Starting Dose Selection.赖诺普利在小儿肾移植患者中的药代动力学、药效学及安全性:对起始剂量选择的意义
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jul;98(1):25-33. doi: 10.1002/cpt.127. Epub 2015 May 2.
2
Drug effects on the CVS in conscious rats: separating cardiac output into heart rate and stroke volume using PKPD modelling.药物对清醒大鼠心血管系统的影响:运用药代动力学-药效学模型将心输出量分解为心率和每搏输出量。
Br J Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;171(22):5076-92. doi: 10.1111/bph.12824. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
3
PKPD modelling of the interrelationship between mean arterial BP, cardiac output and total peripheral resistance in conscious rats.
在清醒大鼠中,平均动脉压、心输出量和总外周阻力之间的相互关系的 PKPD 模型。
Br J Pharmacol. 2013 Aug;169(7):1510-24. doi: 10.1111/bph.12190.
4
Analysis of the pharmacokinetic interaction between cephalexin and quinapril by a nonlinear mixed-effect model.用非线性混合效应模型分析头孢氨苄与喹那普利之间的药代动力学相互作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Jun;42(6):1463-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.6.1463.
5
Effects of probenecid and cimetidine on renal disposition of ofloxacin in rats.丙磺舒和西咪替丁对大鼠体内氧氟沙星肾排泄的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Feb;42(2):456-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.2.456.
6
Tubular transport mechanisms of quinapril and quinaprilat in the isolated perfused rat kidney: effect of organic anions and cations.喹那普利和喹那普利拉在离体灌注大鼠肾脏中的肾小管转运机制:有机阴离子和阳离子的影响
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1996 Aug;24(4):349-68. doi: 10.1007/BF02353517.
7
Pharmacokinetic interaction between cefdinir and two angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in rats.头孢地尼与两种血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在大鼠体内的药代动力学相互作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Apr;40(4):979-82. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.4.979.
8
Comparison of the transplacental transfer of enalapril, captopril and losartan in sheep.依那普利、卡托普利和氯沙坦在绵羊体内经胎盘转运的比较。
Br J Pharmacol. 1995 Apr;114(7):1495-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb13376.x.
9
Uptake and stereoselective binding of the enantiomers of MK-927, a potent carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, by human erythrocytes in vitro.强效碳酸酐酶抑制剂MK-927对映体在体外被人红细胞摄取及立体选择性结合。
Pharm Res. 1992 Mar;9(3):339-44. doi: 10.1023/a:1015886717974.
10
Relative lipophilicities and structural-pharmacological considerations of various angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.
Pharm Res. 1992 Nov;9(11):1480-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1015823315983.