Suppr超能文献

在30 - 50毫秒的脉冲宽度下,铜蒸气激光和倍频Nd:YAG激光在治疗葡萄酒色斑方面是否优于氩激光?

Are copper vapour and frequency doubled Nd:YAG lasers superior to the argon laser for portwine stains at pulse widths of 30-50 milliseconds?

作者信息

Sheehan-Dare R A, Cotterill J A

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, General Infirmary, Leeds, England.

出版信息

Lasers Surg Med. 1996;18(1):46-51. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)18:1<46::AID-LSM6>3.0.CO;2-R.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The copper vapour laser (CVL) and the frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser (FDNYL) have been increasingly adopted as alternatives to the argon laser for treating vascular skin lesions. Automated scanning devices that permit the use of any of these lasers at 30-50 ms pulse widths are now widely used. The object of this study was to compare the CVL and FDNYL with the argon laser using pulse widths in the 30-50 ms range.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one adult patients with red-purple or purple portwine stains (PWS) were treated with a CVL at 578 nm, a FDNYL at 532 nm, and an argon laser at 488/514 nm. Test areas were performed using a Hexascan delivery system and an energy fluence just sufficient to produce immediate tissue change. Pulse widths were maintained constant for each patient (mean 40 msec). The mean fluences used were 13.1 J/cm2, 13.2 J/cm2, and 13.0 J/cm2, respectively. Assessments were made after 4 months using a clinical fading score and an index of light absorbence derived from reflectance spectrophotometry.

RESULTS

Fading scores were statistically significantly better with the CVL (score = 2.29) than the FDNYL (score = 1.83, P < 0.02) and the argon laser (score = 1.89, P < 0.003). The differences between the FDNYL and the argon laser were not significant. Although there was a trend toward lower light absorbence index with the CVL than the argon laser and FDNYL (scores = 177, 179 and 181, respectively), these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite slightly better results with the CVL in terms of the fading produced, differences among the CVL, FDNYL, and argon lasers are small when 30-50 ms pulse widths are employed and are of doubtful clinical significance for darker PWS.

摘要

背景与目的

铜蒸气激光(CVL)和倍频钕:钇铝石榴石激光(FDNYL)已越来越多地被用作氩激光治疗皮肤血管病变的替代方法。现在广泛使用允许以30 - 50毫秒脉冲宽度使用这些激光中的任何一种的自动扫描设备。本研究的目的是比较CVL、FDNYL和氩激光在30 - 50毫秒范围内的脉冲宽度。

研究设计/材料与方法:31例患有红紫色或紫色葡萄酒色斑(PWS)的成年患者分别接受了波长为578nm的CVL、波长为532nm的FDNYL和波长为488/514nm的氩激光治疗。使用Hexascan输送系统进行测试区域治疗,能量通量刚好足以产生即时组织变化。每位患者的脉冲宽度保持恒定(平均40毫秒)。所使用的平均能量通量分别为13.1J/cm²、13.2J/cm²和13.0J/cm²。4个月后使用临床褪色评分和反射分光光度法得出的光吸收指数进行评估。

结果

CVL的褪色评分(评分为2.29)在统计学上显著优于FDNYL(评分为1.83,P < 0.02)和氩激光(评分为1.89,P < 0.003)。FDNYL和氩激光之间的差异不显著。尽管CVL的光吸收指数有低于氩激光和FDNYL的趋势(评分分别为177、179和181),但这些差异在统计学上不显著。

结论

尽管CVL在产生的褪色方面结果略好,但当采用30 - 50毫秒脉冲宽度时,CVL、FDNYL和氩激光之间的差异很小,对于较深的PWS,其临床意义存疑。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验