Pethe J, Begall K, Mühler R, Lottmann J K
Abteilung für Experimentelle Audiologie und Medizinische Physik.
Laryngorhinootologie. 1996 Jan;75(1):23-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997526.
The objective evaluation of the hearing threshold below 1kHz by means of early auditory potentials leads to problems caused by the discrepancy between the required steep rise edge of stimulus and the frequency specificity of the potentials. Therefore the aim of this study was to evaluate the potential role of the AMFR as a diagnostic tool for the assessment of hearing below 1 kHz.
The threshold of the AMFR was compared to the behavioral threshold in 13 normal hearing subjects and 46 patients with hearing loss. The stimulus used was an amplitude-modulated tone at the carrier frequencies of 0.5 and 1 kHz, a modulation frequency of 40 Hz; the modulation depth was 80%. The introduction of an empiric detectibility criterion based on spectral analysis of the response curve allowed the investigator to minimize the examination time and objectify the interpretation of the response. Additional investigations by means of highpass-masking took place to estimate the frequency specificity of the AMFR.
The results show a good correspondence of the AMFR threshold to the behavioral threshold. Depending on hearing loss the mean values of differences between AMFR threshold and behavioral threshold are 3 dB - 13 dB. The degree of correspondence was highest in the patients with the most severe hearing loss. An influence of underlying cause of the hearing loss could not be found. Additionally the frequency specificity of the response potential was proven with high-pass masking in normal hearing subjects. Masking with cut-off frequencies above the carrier frequencies had no influence on the response while masking at the carrier frequency resulted in a strong reduction of the response curve.
The results show that the 40 Hz-AMFR is a suitable method for the objective frequency-specific assessment of hearing in adults. Problems in the clinical use of the AMFR are caused by the long investigation time and the dependence of the potentials on the state of wakeness.
通过早期听觉电位对1kHz以下听力阈值进行客观评估时,会因刺激所需的陡峭上升沿与电位的频率特异性之间的差异而产生问题。因此,本研究的目的是评估听觉中潜伏期反应(AMFR)作为评估1kHz以下听力的诊断工具的潜在作用。
将13名听力正常的受试者和46名听力损失患者的AMFR阈值与行为阈值进行比较。使用的刺激是载波频率为0.5和1kHz、调制频率为40Hz的调幅音;调制深度为80%。基于反应曲线频谱分析引入经验可检测性标准,使研究者能够缩短检查时间并客观解释反应。通过高通掩蔽进行了额外的研究,以估计AMFR的频率特异性。
结果显示AMFR阈值与行为阈值具有良好的对应关系。根据听力损失情况,AMFR阈值与行为阈值之间差异的平均值为3dB - 13dB。在听力损失最严重的患者中,对应程度最高。未发现听力损失潜在原因的影响。此外,在听力正常的受试者中通过高通掩蔽证明了反应电位的频率特异性。用高于载波频率的截止频率进行掩蔽对反应无影响,而在载波频率处进行掩蔽会导致反应曲线大幅降低。
结果表明,40Hz-AMFR是客观评估成人频率特异性听力的合适方法。AMFR临床应用中的问题是由检查时间长以及电位对觉醒状态的依赖性导致的。