Suppr超能文献

影响基层医疗中西沙必利治疗消化不良剂量选择及疗效的因素。奥地利西沙必利研究小组。

Factors affecting dose selection and outcome of cisapride treatment for dyspepsia in primary care. The Austro-Cis Study Group.

作者信息

Brunner H

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital of Vienna-Lainz, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1996 Aug;10(4):587-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1996.7149000.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the prescribing habits and impact of life style or disease factors on the outcome of cisapride treatment for dyspepsia in primary care.

METHOD

In this large-scale open, multi-centre study in Austria, primary care physicians were asked to prescribe cisapride according to the current prescribing guidelines (standard dose, 5 mg t.d.s.; in case of severe symptoms, 10 mg t.d.s.). Symptom severity was rated by the physicians, after 4 weeks of treatment and after another 4 weeks of follow-up without medication. The global therapeutic result was given by both the physicians and patients.

RESULTS

Among the 3912 recruited patients, 60.0% received cisapride 5 mg t.d.s. and 38.5% received 10 mg t.d.s. The dose selection by the physicians was not only influenced by severity of the symptoms (significantly more patients with severe symptoms receiving the higher dosage when compared to those with milder symptoms (P < 0.001), but also other factors were associated with prescription of the higher dose: including heavy smoking, longer pre-existence of complaints and failing previous treatment. After 4 weeks of treatment, the dyspeptic symptoms improved in about 80% of patients, in both dosage groups. Four weeks after discontinuation of medication, 21% of patients still further improved, while 10% relapsed. The overall therapeutic outcome defined as the percentage of patients with good or excellent results was comparable in both dosage groups and appeared independent of the patient's characteristics, life style or disease factors. However, when only the proportion of "excellent' responders was analysed, this rate significantly decreased the longer the duration of symptoms, the heavier the smoking and with failing previous therapy. This effect was particularly seen with the patients' ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the open-study design does not allow evaluation of the contribution of placebo-effect and calls for cautious interpretation, the data suggest that the use of flexible cisapride doses for management of dyspepsia in primary care results in a good acute and medium-term outcome, with apparently little dependence on life style and disease factors, at least when assessed by physicians.

摘要

背景

在基层医疗中,关于西沙必利治疗消化不良的处方习惯以及生活方式或疾病因素对其治疗结果的影响,人们了解甚少。

方法

在奥地利进行的这项大规模开放性多中心研究中,要求基层医疗医生根据当前处方指南开具西沙必利(标准剂量,每日三次,每次5毫克;症状严重者,每日三次,每次10毫克)。治疗4周后以及停药随访4周后,由医生对症状严重程度进行评分。医生和患者分别给出总体治疗结果。

结果

在招募的3912名患者中,60.0%接受每日三次、每次5毫克的西沙必利治疗,38.5%接受每日三次、每次10毫克的治疗。医生选择剂量不仅受症状严重程度影响(与症状较轻的患者相比,症状严重的患者接受高剂量治疗的比例显著更高(P < 0.001)),而且其他因素也与高剂量处方有关:包括重度吸烟、症状持续时间较长以及既往治疗失败。治疗4周后,两个剂量组中约80%的患者消化不良症状有所改善。停药四周后,21%的患者症状仍进一步改善,而10%的患者复发。两个剂量组中,总体治疗结果(定义为治疗效果良好或极佳的患者百分比)相当,且似乎与患者特征、生活方式或疾病因素无关。然而,仅分析“极佳”反应者的比例时,症状持续时间越长、吸烟越严重以及既往治疗失败,该比例显著降低。这种效应在患者的评分中尤为明显。

结论

尽管开放研究设计无法评估安慰剂效应的作用,需要谨慎解读,但数据表明,在基层医疗中使用灵活剂量的西沙必利治疗消化不良可取得良好的急性和中期治疗效果,至少在医生评估时,对生活方式和疾病因素的依赖性似乎很小。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验