Morikawa T, Terao A, Iwasaki M
Pharmaceutical Development Division, Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
J Biopharm Stat. 1996 Jul;6(3):343-59. doi: 10.1080/10543409608835148.
Various modified Bonferroni procedures (MBPs) have been proposed in order to improve the power of the classical Bonferroni procedure (CBP). In the present paper, powers of these MBPs are investigated by a Monte Carlo study for pairwise comparisons. It is shown that they can be remarkably more powerful than the CBP and Tukey's procedure with respect to all-pairs power, whereas all these procedures with respect to any-pair power are almost the same. Therefore, we recommend the use of MBPs rather than the CBP or Tukey's procedure. Shaffer's procedure sometimes shows higher power than other MBPs and would be the best choice for pairwise comparisons.
为了提高经典邦费罗尼方法（CBP）的检验效能，人们提出了各种修正的邦费罗尼方法（MBP）。在本文中，通过蒙特卡罗研究对这些MBP在两两比较中的检验效能进行了考察。结果表明，就所有成对比较的检验效能而言，它们比CBP和图基方法的检验效能显著更高，而对于任意成对比较的检验效能，所有这些方法几乎相同。因此，我们建议使用MBP而非CBP或图基方法。谢弗方法有时比其他MBP显示出更高的检验效能，将是两两比较的最佳选择。
