Nocaudie-Calzada M, Huglo D, Carnaille B, Proye C, Marchandise X
Institut de Médecine Nucléaire et Imagerie Fonctionnelle, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France.
Eur J Nucl Med. 1996 Nov;23(11):1448-54. doi: 10.1007/BF01254466.
The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the ability of radiolabelled somatostatin analogue (RSA) and metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy to display carcinoid tumours. Forty patients were studied after radiological assessment based on clinical symptomatology. These patients had radiologically demonstrated tumours (n=28), resected tumours discovered to be of the carcinoid type (n=5) or clinically and biologically suspected carcinoid tumours (n=7). They underwent indium-111 DTPA-pentetreotide or iodine-123-Tyr-3-octreotide and 131I-MIBG scintigraphy. The results were compared with those of complementary surgical or morphological examinations and analysed according to the site of the tumour and the symptomatology. In the case of 31 patients with a total of 55 tumoral sites, the sensitivity of the initial radiological assessment, of RSA and of MIBG was 96%, 86% and 64%, respectively, for the detection of at least one tumour per patient, but 51%, 85% and 51%, respectively, for the total number of sites. No site was detected solely by MIBG. The concordance between RSA and MIBG was better when all sites were considered (kappa index+0.44) than for only extrahepatic abdominal tumoral sites (kappa index+0.095). Abdominal, thoracic or bone marrow tumours were more easily detected with RSA than with MIBG. Hepatic invasion (21 cases) was more easily detected by radiology (sensitivity 100%) than by RSA and MIBG, both of which displayed a sensitivity of 80%, but with differences in uptake intensity. Tumour detection using MIBG was more significantly linked with flush (P<0.01) than with diarrhoea (P>0.10). In the assessment of carcinoid tumours, RSA scintigraphy should be carried out initially (just after hepatic ultrasonography) and supplemented by MIBG, as comparison of the studies serves to guide therapeutic options and might be valuable for prognosis.
这项前瞻性研究的目的是比较放射性标记的生长抑素类似物(RSA)和间碘苄胍(MIBG)闪烁扫描法显示类癌肿瘤的能力。根据临床症状进行放射学评估后,对40例患者进行了研究。这些患者有放射学证实的肿瘤(n = 28)、经切除发现为类癌类型的肿瘤(n = 5)或临床和生物学上怀疑为类癌的肿瘤(n = 7)。他们接受了铟-111 DTPA-五肽胃泌素或碘-123-Tyr-3-奥曲肽以及131I-MIBG闪烁扫描。将结果与补充的手术或形态学检查结果进行比较,并根据肿瘤部位和症状进行分析。在31例共有55个肿瘤部位的患者中,初始放射学评估、RSA和MIBG检测每位患者至少一个肿瘤的敏感性分别为96%、86%和64%,但对于肿瘤部位总数的敏感性分别为51%、85%和51%。没有一个部位是仅通过MIBG检测到的。当考虑所有部位时,RSA和MIBG之间的一致性(kappa指数+0.44)比仅考虑肝外腹部肿瘤部位时更好(kappa指数+0.095)。与MIBG相比,RSA更容易检测到腹部、胸部或骨髓肿瘤。肝脏侵犯(21例)通过放射学检查(敏感性100%)比通过RSA和MIBG更容易检测到,RSA和MIBG的敏感性均为80%,但摄取强度存在差异。使用MIBG检测肿瘤与潮红(P<0.01)的关联比与腹泻(P>0.10)更显著。在类癌肿瘤的评估中,应首先进行RSA闪烁扫描(紧接肝脏超声检查之后),并辅以MIBG,因为研究的比较有助于指导治疗选择,可能对预后有价值。