Berger J T, Rosner F
Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, NY 11501, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Oct 14;156(18):2051-6.
Practice guidelines, which are assistive tools for clinicians, have a long tradition in clinical medicine. Traditionally, these documents were developed by physicians to improve quality of care and can provide practitioners with valuable medical information and improve objectivity in medical decision making. Guidelines development by nonphysician groups is increasing. Guidelines are now intended to assist in decreasing costs, in reducing liability risk, and in utilization review, among other activities. Despite this enthusiasm for guidelines, their development is variable and validity remains largely untested. The intended clinical and nonclinical applications of guidelines require critical analysis. Practice guidelines are not inherently unethical. However, applications of nonmedical values combined with intense pressures on health care provision create an environment for guideline misuse. The ethical implications of practice guidelines are examined in our article.
实践指南作为临床医生的辅助工具,在临床医学中有着悠久的传统。传统上,这些文件由医生制定以提高医疗质量,可为从业者提供有价值的医学信息,并提高医疗决策的客观性。非医生团体制定指南的情况正在增加。现在,指南旨在帮助降低成本、降低责任风险以及进行利用审查等活动。尽管对指南充满热情,但其制定过程参差不齐,有效性在很大程度上仍未得到检验。指南预期的临床和非临床应用需要进行批判性分析。实践指南本身并非不道德。然而,非医学价值观的应用以及医疗服务面临的巨大压力为指南的滥用创造了环境。我们的文章探讨了实践指南的伦理意义。