Nevo B
J Psychol. 1977 Jul;96(2d Half):303-8. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1977.9915913.
Two hundred and thirty-two men and women students at the University of Haifa were administered a Hebrew version of the California Psychological Inventory. Half of the students were kibbutz born, and the others city born. The two samples were matched on sex, age, level of education, and economic level. Of the 18 scales, significant differences between the means were found in only two scales for each sex group: namely, Responsibility and Achievement via Independence for males, and Achievement via Independence and Intellectual Efficiency for females. The other comparisons of means for each sex group were not significant, nor were there any significant differences between the variances. It seems, then, that the differences in child rearing between kibbutz and city do not necessarily produce major differences in personality traits. An alternative hypothesis might be suggested: kibbutz child-rearing practices, different as they are from the city approach, do not create a "new" type of personality.
海法大学的232名男女学生接受了加利福尼亚心理调查表的希伯来语版本测试。一半学生出生在集体农场，另一半出生在城市。两组样本在性别、年龄、教育水平和经济水平上进行了匹配。在18个量表中，每个性别组仅在两个量表上发现了均值的显著差异：即男性的责任量表和通过独立获得成就量表，以及女性的通过独立获得成就量表和智力效能量表。每个性别组的其他均值比较均不显著，方差之间也没有显著差异。那么，似乎集体农场和城市在育儿方式上的差异不一定会导致人格特质的重大差异。可以提出另一种假设：集体农场的育儿方式虽然与城市的方式不同，但并不会塑造出一种“新”的人格类型。
