The validity of some haematological and ELISA methods for the diagnosis of canine heartworm disease.

Examinations for heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) were performed on 175 impounded dogs from a hyperendemic area of the Po Valley (Italy). Each blood sample was used with five haematological diagnostic methods (filtration, direct smear, modified Knott, clotted blood and capillary tube) and three commercial ELISA kits (PetChek, Diasystems, Uni-Tec). The results were compared with the true infection status obtained from post-mortem examination of the heart, pulmonary arteries, thoracic venae cavae and lungs. The prevalence of the infection by adult worms at necropsy was 63%. The sensitivity of the tests ranged from 60% (capillary tube) to 81% (Diasystems) and the specificity from 88% (filtration) to 98% (PetChek). The results of all the tests differed significantly (p < 0.01) from those obtained at necropsy. The sensitivity of the tests was also assessed with respect to the differing numbers of worms in the hosts. A positive correlation between the worm burden and the sensitivity was observed in all the tests. It is apparent that the ELISA methods were better able to detect cases with a low number of worms than the haematological tests.