Petrick M E, Royster L H, Royster J D, Reist P
IBM Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1996 Oct;57(10):924-8. doi: 10.1080/15428119691014440.
The objective of this study was to determine the impact of the new American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIHnew) noise criteria, as compared to the current U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) hearing conservation criteria, on the number of employees to be included in the hearing conservation program at one industrial facility. This study also compares the combined effects of a 3-dB versus a 5-dB exchange rate and an 80-dBA versus a 90-dBA measurement threshold on daily noise doses and equivalent 8-hr time-weighted averages (TWAs). Employee noise exposures were measured using paired Ametek MK-3 noise dosimeters, one dosimeter set to the ACGIHnew noise criteria and one to the present OSHA hearing conservation criteria. Samples were collected over 4-hr periods (half-shifts) for 50 employees in 7 job categories. Results indicate that the majority of the employees' exposures fell below an 8-hr TWAOSHA of 85 dBA. The differences between the predicted TWAACGIHnew and the TWAOSHA ranged between 0.2 and 12.6 dB for paired samples, with an average difference of 4.6 dB. Overall, these differences in employee 8-hr TWAs would project a 36% increase in the percent of the population enrolled in the hearing conservation program and a 50% increase in the percent of the population required to wear hearing protection.
本研究的目的是确定与美国现行职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)听力保护标准相比,美国政府工业卫生学家会议(ACGIH)新的噪声标准对某一工业设施中纳入听力保护计划的员工数量的影响。本研究还比较了3分贝与5分贝交换率以及80分贝与90分贝测量阈值对每日噪声剂量和等效8小时时间加权平均值(TWA)的综合影响。使用配对的Ametek MK-3噪声剂量计测量员工的噪声暴露情况,一个剂量计设置为ACGIH新的噪声标准,另一个设置为现行的OSHA听力保护标准。对7个工作类别的50名员工在4小时时间段(半个班次)内进行了样本采集。结果表明,大多数员工的暴露水平低于OSHA规定的8小时TWA 85分贝。配对样本的预测TWAACGIH新值与TWAOSHA值之间的差异在0.2至12.6分贝之间,平均差异为4.6分贝。总体而言,员工8小时TWA的这些差异预计将使纳入听力保护计划的人口百分比增加36%,使需要佩戴听力保护装置的人口百分比增加50%。