Wable J, Collet L, Chéry-Croze S
Laboratoire Perception et Mécanismes Auditifs, UPRESA CNRS 5020, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Oct;100(4 Pt 1):2228-35. doi: 10.1121/1.417932.
The present study used distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) latency as a tool to provide information about the generation sites of 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 DPOAEs in humans. The DPOAE 2f1-f2 is supposed to be generated near the f2 site, but little is known about the 2f2-f1 DPOAE processing in humans. The present work sought to test several hypotheses as to the possible generation of 2f1-f2 at the f2 site and of 2f2-f1 at the 2f2-f1 site as well as their backward reflection site, by comparing latencies of the two DPOAEs, under appropriate frequency manipulation. The effect of stimulus level was also studied. The latency values were calculated as the phase-lag related to the frequency shift, using the ILO92 software. Amplitudes were lower and latencies shorter for 2f2-f1 than for 2f1-f2. As expected, 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 DPOAE latency decreased with increasing stimulus level and frequency. At 70 dB SPL, latencies of DPOAEs with primaries f1 and f2 or f1 and f2, chosen so as to obtain 2f1-f2 = 2f2 - f1, were identical, whereas at 55 dB SPL the similarities were less obvious, suggesting two different generation processes. The present study suggests that the comparison of several DPOAE components may produce useful information about their processing within the cochlea.
本研究使用畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)潜伏期作为一种工具,以提供有关人类中2f1-f2和2f2-f1 DPOAE产生部位的信息。DPOAE 2f1-f2被认为是在f2部位附近产生的,但关于人类中2f2-f1 DPOAE的处理知之甚少。本研究试图通过在适当的频率操纵下比较两种DPOAE的潜伏期,来检验关于2f1-f2在f2部位以及2f2-f1在2f2-f1部位及其反向反射部位可能产生的几种假设。还研究了刺激强度的影响。使用ILO92软件,将潜伏期值计算为与频率偏移相关的相位滞后。2f2-f1的幅度低于2f1-f2,潜伏期也更短。正如预期的那样,2f1-f2和2f2-f1 DPOAE潜伏期随着刺激强度和频率的增加而降低。在70 dB SPL时,选择 primaries f1和f2或f1和f2以获得2f1-f2 = 2f2 - f1的DPOAE潜伏期是相同的,而在55 dB SPL时,相似性不太明显,这表明存在两种不同的产生过程。本研究表明,比较几种DPOAE成分可能会产生有关它们在耳蜗内处理的有用信息。