Suppr超能文献

瑞典高血压治疗的成本效益:干预标准与药物治疗选择的分析

The cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment in Sweden: an analysis of the criteria for intervention and the choice of drug treatment.

作者信息

Johannesson M

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Feb;10 Suppl 2:S23-6.

PMID:8868040
Abstract

Results of an analysis of the cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment in Sweden are presented. The cost per life-year gained decreases with age for both men and women and is relatively low for middle-aged and older men and women even in the blood pressure range 90-94 mmHg. The results indicate that it is in general cost-effective to treat middle-aged and older men and women in Sweden with a diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mmHg, but that it is questionable whether it is in general cost-effective to treat younger men and women with mild hypertension. It is furthermore shown that ACE-inhibitors and calcium-antagonists may be cost-effective in some patient groups at a high risk of coronary heart disease, if they achieve the epidemiologically expected risk reduction for coronary heart disease. Since an improved risk reduction has not been demonstrated in clinical trials ACE-inhibitors and calcium-antagonists cannot, however, at present be recommended for hypertension treatment in any patient groups unless treatment with diuretics and beta-blockers is contraindicated.

摘要

本文展示了瑞典高血压治疗成本效益分析的结果。男性和女性每获得一个生命年的成本均随年龄增长而降低,即使在血压范围为90 - 94 mmHg时,中年及老年男性和女性的该成本也相对较低。结果表明,在瑞典,一般而言,治疗舒张压≥90 mmHg的中年及老年男性和女性具有成本效益,但对于治疗轻度高血压的年轻男性和女性,其总体成本效益是否合理仍存在疑问。此外还表明,如果血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE - inhibitors)和钙拮抗剂能实现冠心病在流行病学上预期的风险降低,那么它们在某些冠心病高风险患者群体中可能具有成本效益。然而,由于临床试验中尚未证明其能进一步降低风险,因此除非利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂治疗存在禁忌,目前不能推荐ACE抑制剂和钙拮抗剂用于任何患者群体的高血压治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验