Suppr超能文献

国际初级保健分类法在挪威作为一种标准分类法。

ICPC as a standard classification in Norway.

作者信息

Brage S, Bentsen B G, Bjerkedal T, Nygård J F, Tellnes G

机构信息

Institute of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 1996 Aug;13(4):391-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.4.391.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Classification for Primary Care (ICPC) has been the standard classification for diagnoses on sickness certificates and bills for services to the National Insurance Administration in Norway since 1992. Coding according to ICPC is compulsory for all general practitioners.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to describe the introduction of ICPC in Norway, to comment on introduction problems, and to examine the compliance and validity of coding.

METHODS

The study was based on statistics for episodes of sickness certification in the National Benefit Absence Register.

RESULTS

In 1994, the underlying medical diagnosis was coded in 98% of the sickness absence episodes lasting more than 2 weeks. Component 1 codes (symptom codes) were used in 23% of episodes, compared with 26-31% in practice studies.

CONCLUSIONS

ICPC-coded data in a large Norwegian register appear promising. Most doctors do accurate and careful work in coding, and data appear to be of acceptable quality for further analysis. It is a matter of concern, however, that as many as 23% of episodes had component 1 codes, since these certificates were issued during follow-up encounters. The introduction of ICPC coding has enabled researchers to use diagnoses in the analyses of sickness absence. The growing use of ICPC in general practice has made multi-practice studies possible. The introduction of criteria is mandatory for the improvement of validity in diagnostic coding.

摘要

背景

自1992年以来,国际初级保健分类(ICPC)一直是挪威疾病诊断证明及向国家保险管理局提交的服务账单的标准分类。所有全科医生都必须按照ICPC进行编码。

目的

本研究的目的是描述ICPC在挪威的引入情况,对引入过程中出现的问题进行评论,并检验编码的依从性和有效性。

方法

该研究基于国家病假登记册中疾病证明事件的统计数据。

结果

1994年,在持续超过2周的病假事件中,98%的事件对潜在的医学诊断进行了编码。23%的事件使用了第1部分编码(症状编码),而在实际研究中的比例为26% - 31%。

结论

挪威一个大型登记册中经ICPC编码的数据前景良好。大多数医生在编码时工作准确且认真,数据质量似乎可接受,能够进行进一步分析。然而,令人担忧的是,多达23%的事件使用了第1部分编码,因为这些证明是在随访时开具的。ICPC编码的引入使研究人员能够在病假分析中使用诊断信息。ICPC在全科医疗中的使用日益广泛,使得多机构研究成为可能。引入标准对于提高诊断编码的有效性是必不可少的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验