Gross J B, Blouin R T, Zandsberg S, Conard P F, Häussler J
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington 06030-2015, USA.
Anesthesiology. 1996 Oct;85(4):713-20. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199610000-00005.
Patients who receive a combination of a benzodiazepine and an opioid for conscious sedation are at risk for developing respiratory depression. While flumazenil effectively antagonizes the respiratory depression associated with a benzodiazepine alone, its efficacy in the presence of both a benzodiazepine and an opioid has not been established. This study was designed to determine whether flumazenil can reverse benzodiazepine-induced depression of ventilatory drive in the presence of an opioid.
Twelve healthy volunteers completed this randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Ventilatory responses to carbon dioxide and to isocapnic hypoxia were determined during four treatment phases: (1) baseline, (2) alfentanil infusion; (3) combined midazolam and alfentanil infusions, and (4) combined alfentanil, midazolam, and "study drug" (consisting of either flumazenil or flumazenil vehicle) infusions. Subjects returned 2-6 weeks later to receive the alternate study drug.
Alfentanil decreased the slope of the carbon dioxide response curve from 2.14 +/- 0.40 to 1.43 +/- 0.19 l.min-1.mmHg-1 (x +/- SE, P < 0.05), and decreased the minute ventilation at P(ET)CO2 = 50 mmHg (VE50) from 19.7 +/- 1.2 to 14.8 +/- 0.9l.min-1 (P < 0.05). Midazolam further reduced these variables to 0.87 +/- 0.17 l.min-1.mmHg-1 (P < 0.05) and 11.7 +/- 0.8 l.min-1 (P < 0.05), respectively. With addition of flumazenil, slope and VE50 increased to 1.47 +/- 0.37 l.min-1.mmHg-1 (P < 0.05) and 16.4 +/- 2.0l.min-1 (P < 0.05); after placebo, the respective values of 1.02 +/- 0.19 l.min-1.mmHg-1 and 12.5 +/- 1.2 l.min-1 did not differe significantly from their values during combined alfentanil and midazolam administration. The effect of flumazenil differed significantly from that of placebo (P < 0.05). Both the slope and the displacement of the hypoxic ventilatory response, measured at P(ET)CO2 = 46 +/- 1 mmHG, were affected similarly, with flumazenil showing a significant improvement compared to placebo.
Flumazenil effectively reverses the benzodiazepine component of ventilatory depression during combined administration of a benzodiazepine and an opioid.
接受苯二氮䓬类药物和阿片类药物联合用于清醒镇静的患者有发生呼吸抑制的风险。虽然氟马西尼能有效拮抗单独使用苯二氮䓬类药物所致的呼吸抑制,但其在苯二氮䓬类药物和阿片类药物同时存在时的疗效尚未确定。本研究旨在确定在有阿片类药物存在的情况下,氟马西尼能否逆转苯二氮䓬类药物引起的通气驱动抑制。
12名健康志愿者完成了这项随机、双盲、交叉研究。在四个治疗阶段测定对二氧化碳和等容性低氧的通气反应:(1)基线期;(2)阿芬太尼输注期;(3)咪达唑仑和阿芬太尼联合输注期;(4)阿芬太尼、咪达唑仑和“研究药物”(由氟马西尼或氟马西尼溶媒组成)联合输注期。受试者在2 - 6周后返回接受另一种研究药物。
阿芬太尼使二氧化碳反应曲线斜率从2.14±0.40降至1.43±0.19升·分钟-1·毫米汞柱-1(x±SE,P<0.05),并使呼气末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)为50毫米汞柱时的分钟通气量(VE50)从19.7±1.2降至14.8±0.9升·分钟-1(P<0.05)。咪达唑仑进一步将这些变量分别降至0.87±0.17升·分钟-1·毫米汞柱-1(P<0.05)和11.7±0.8升·分钟-1(P<0.05)。加入氟马西尼后,斜率和VE50分别增至1.47±0.37升·分钟-1·毫米汞柱-1(P<0.05)和16.4±2.0升·分钟-1(P<0.05);给予安慰剂后,1.02±0.19升·分钟-1·毫米汞柱-1和12.5±1.2升·分钟-1的相应值与阿芬太尼和咪达唑仑联合给药时的值相比无显著差异。氟马西尼的作用与安慰剂有显著差异(P<0.05)。在呼气末二氧化碳分压为46±1毫米汞柱时测量的低氧通气反应的斜率和偏移同样受到影响,与安慰剂相比,氟马西尼显示出显著改善。
在苯二氮䓬类药物和阿片类药物联合给药期间,氟马西尼能有效逆转通气抑制中的苯二氮䓬类药物成分。