Patterson C C, Carson D J, Hadden D R
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Diabetologia. 1996 Sep;39(9):1063-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00400655.
During the period 1989-1994, 462 cases of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were registered among children from Northern Ireland aged under 15 years. The estimated completeness of the register was 98.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97.7%, 99.9%). A standardised rate of 19.6 (95% CI 17.8, 21.4) per 100 000 person years was obtained, placing Northern Ireland near the top of the range of published incidence in the United Kingdom, with a rate close to that reported for Scotland. In an analysis based on 217 postcode sectors, areas with a high population density and the most material deprivation were observed to have the lowest incidence rates. After inclusion of population density in a Poisson regression analysis, the component of deprivation which was found to be most significant was household crowding. Relative to children living in areas of low population density, there was a reduced risk for children in medium (relative incidence 0.85 (95% confidence limits CI 0.67, 1.09)) and high (0.62 (95% CI 0.48,0.80)) population density areas. Similarly, relative to children living in areas with low levels of household crowding, there was a reduced risk for children in medium (relative incidence 0.73 (95% CI 0.58,0.93)) and high (0.67 (95% CI 0.53, 0.83)) levels of household crowding. Tests for space-time clustering at diagnosis and at birth were negative. A possible explanation for the differences in incidence rate observed in this study is that exposure to infections very early in childhood is a protective factor. Later infections may act as either initiators or promoters of diabetes, but the absence of space-time clustering suggests that no single specific infectious agent is responsible.
在1989年至1994年期间,北爱尔兰15岁以下儿童中登记了462例胰岛素依赖型糖尿病病例。登记的估计完整性为98.8%(95%置信区间(CI)97.7%,99.9%)。每10万人年的标准化发病率为19.6(95%CI 17.8,21.4),这使北爱尔兰在英国公布的发病率范围内名列前茅,发病率接近苏格兰报告的水平。在基于217个邮政编码区域的分析中,观察到人口密度高和物质匮乏最严重的地区发病率最低。在泊松回归分析中纳入人口密度后,发现最显著的匮乏因素是家庭拥挤。与生活在人口密度低的地区的儿童相比,生活在中等(相对发病率0.85(95%置信限CI 0.67,1.09))和高(0.62(95%CI 0.48,0.80))人口密度地区的儿童风险降低。同样,与生活在家庭拥挤程度低的地区的儿童相比,生活在中等(相对发病率0.73(95%CI 0.58,0.93))和高(0.67(95%CI 0.53,0.83))家庭拥挤程度地区的儿童风险降低。对诊断时和出生时的时空聚集性测试均为阴性。本研究中观察到的发病率差异的一个可能解释是,儿童早期接触感染是一个保护因素。后期感染可能作为糖尿病的引发因素或促进因素,但缺乏时空聚集性表明没有单一特定的传染源对此负责。