Willis J A, Scott R S, Brown L J, Forbes L V, Schmidli R S, Zimmet P Z, MacKay I R, Rowley M J
Lipid and Diabetes Research Group, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1996 Jul;33(2):89-97. doi: 10.1016/0168-8227(96)01281-8.
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase (anti-GAD) and islet cell antibodies (ICA) in relation to beta-cell function in adults newly-diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. beta-cell function was assessed in adults aged 25-70 years newly-diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (n = 84) and control subjects (n = 34) using a 1.6 MJ mixed meal test procedure. beta-cell function was evaluated by the true insulin (defined as immunoreactive insulin minus proinsulin) response to the mixed meal test. Subjects were classified on the basis of the area under the true insulin curve (normal 16830-107700 pmol min/I) and the sum of the 30 and 60 min incremental response (normal 285-3295 pmol/I). The prevalence of anti-GAD and ICA was determined using radioimmunoprecipitation and indirect immunofluorescence, respectively. Twelve (14%) of the study cohort were insulin deficient showing little or no true insulin release. Of the insulin deficient individuals, seven (58%) subjects were anti-GAD antibody positive, compared with eleven (15%) of the subjects without insulin deficiency (P < 0.001). Seven (58%) insulin deficient subjects were ICA positive, whereas only two (3%) non-insulin deficient subjects were ICA positive (P < 0.001). Eight (67%) of the insulin deficient individuals had anti-GAD or ICA, compared with twelve (17%) of those who were not insulin deficient (P < 0.001). The positive predictive values for insulin deficiency of anti-GAD and ICA were 39 and 78% respectively. The sensitivity of both antibodies for detecting insulin deficiency was 50%. The specificity for detecting insulin deficiency was 85% for anti-GAD and 97% for ICA. Positivity for both anti-GAD and ICA gave a specificity and positive predictive value for insulin deficiency of 99%, and a sensitivity of 50%. Nearly one in seven adults presenting with diabetes mellitus as a new diagnosis are insulin deficient using our criteria. Loss of beta-cell function in two thirds of individuals who are insulin deficient can be identified by anti-GAD and ICA. Early detection of these immune markers of beta-cell damage creates the potential for immune modulation to limit such damage.
本研究旨在确定新诊断为糖尿病的成年人中谷氨酸脱羧酶抗体(抗GAD)和胰岛细胞抗体(ICA)的流行情况及其与β细胞功能的关系。采用1.6 MJ混合餐试验程序,对25 - 70岁新诊断为糖尿病的成年人(n = 84)和对照受试者(n = 34)的β细胞功能进行评估。通过混合餐试验中真胰岛素(定义为免疫反应性胰岛素减去胰岛素原)反应来评估β细胞功能。根据真胰岛素曲线下面积(正常范围16830 - 107700 pmol·min/I)以及30分钟和60分钟增量反应之和(正常范围285 - 3295 pmol/I)对受试者进行分类。分别使用放射免疫沉淀法和间接免疫荧光法测定抗GAD和ICA的流行情况。研究队列中有12名(14%)胰岛素缺乏,几乎没有或没有真胰岛素释放。在胰岛素缺乏个体中,7名(58%)受试者抗GAD抗体呈阳性,而在无胰岛素缺乏的受试者中有11名(15%)呈阳性(P < 0.001)。7名(58%)胰岛素缺乏受试者ICA呈阳性,而只有2名(3%)非胰岛素缺乏受试者ICA呈阳性(P < 0.001)。8名(67%)胰岛素缺乏个体有抗GAD或ICA,而在非胰岛素缺乏个体中有12名(17%)有抗GAD或ICA(P < 0.001)。抗GAD和ICA对胰岛素缺乏的阳性预测值分别为39%和78%。两种抗体检测胰岛素缺乏的敏感性均为50%。抗GAD检测胰岛素缺乏的特异性为85%,ICA为97%。抗GAD和ICA均呈阳性时,对胰岛素缺乏的特异性和阳性预测值为99%,敏感性为50%。按照我们的标准,新诊断为糖尿病的成年人中近七分之一存在胰岛素缺乏。三分之二胰岛素缺乏个体的β细胞功能丧失可通过抗GAD和ICA检测出来。早期检测这些β细胞损伤的免疫标志物为通过免疫调节来限制此类损伤创造了可能性。