Wojnarowski C, Storm Van's Gravesande K, Riedler J, Eichler I, Gartner C, Frischer T
University Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Eur Respir J. 1996 Sep;9(9):1896-901. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09091896.
There is still controversy about the most suitable method to measure bronchial hyperresponsiveness in children. In epidemiological surveys, nonisotonic aerosols are being used increasingly for bronchial provocation testing. Our aim was to study the acceptability, safety and correlation between two published bronchial challenge tests. Two standardized protocols--the inhalation of hypertonic saline (HS) and ultrasonically-nebulized distilled water (UNDW)--were performed in 36 children: 19 patients with the clinical diagnosis of mild-to-moderate asthma (7-12 yrs of age), and 17 control subjects (8-18 yrs of age). HS challenge involved stepwise inhalation of 4.5% saline (for 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 min), whereas challenge with UNDW was performed as a single step protocol with 10 min inhalation of cold UNDW. Asthma medication was withheld prior to challenge testing. Thirty five subjects completed both challenge tests (one asthmatic patient did not return after UNDW challenge) in random order within a 7 day time interval. For HS a > or = 15% reduction in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) from baseline was considered a positive response, and for UNDW a > or = 10% decrease. In 13 of the 19 asthmatic patients, but in none of the controls, a positive response was observed for UNDW. Fifteen out of 18 patients and one control subject had a positive response to HS. Twelve out of 18 asthmatic children responded to both challenges, three responded only to HS and three had no response to either challenge. There was a negative correlation between log provocative dose causing a 15% reduction in FEV1 (PD15) after HS and the maximum fall in FEV1 after UNDW (rs = -0.63; p < 0.005). The HS challenge had a lower acceptability than challenge with UNDW due to the unpleasant salty taste of HS. However, this did not inhibit the completion of the tests in any subject. The results of this study suggest a good correlation between response to hypertonic saline and ultrasonically-nebulized distilled water in children with mild-to-moderate asthma. A multiple step protocol might be safer when applied in field studies involving children.
关于测量儿童支气管高反应性的最合适方法仍存在争议。在流行病学调查中,非等渗气雾剂越来越多地用于支气管激发试验。我们的目的是研究两种已发表的支气管激发试验之间的可接受性、安全性及相关性。对36名儿童进行了两种标准化方案——吸入高渗盐水(HS)和超声雾化蒸馏水(UNDW):19名临床诊断为轻至中度哮喘的患者(7至12岁),以及17名对照受试者(8至18岁)。HS激发试验包括逐步吸入4.5%盐水(持续0.5、1、2、4和8分钟),而UNDW激发试验采用单步方案,吸入冷的UNDW 10分钟。激发试验前停用哮喘药物。35名受试者在7天时间间隔内随机顺序完成了两种激发试验(一名哮喘患者在UNDW激发试验后未返回)。对于HS,一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)较基线降低≥15%被视为阳性反应,对于UNDW,降低≥10%被视为阳性反应。19名哮喘患者中有13名UNDW激发试验呈阳性反应,但对照组均无阳性反应。18名患者中有15名和1名对照受试者HS激发试验呈阳性反应。18名哮喘儿童中有12名对两种激发试验均有反应,3名仅对HS有反应,3名对两种激发试验均无反应。HS激发试验后导致FEV1降低15%的对数激发剂量(PD15)与UNDW激发试验后FEV1的最大下降之间存在负相关(rs = -0.63;p < 0.005)。由于HS有 unpleasant salty taste,HS激发试验的可接受性低于UNDW激发试验。然而,这并未阻止任何受试者完成试验。本研究结果表明,轻至中度哮喘儿童对高渗盐水和超声雾化蒸馏水的反应之间具有良好的相关性。在涉及儿童的现场研究中应用多步方案可能更安全。