DeLeon P H, Wiggins J G
c/o Senator Daniel K. Inouye, U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 20510, USA.
Am Psychol. 1996 Mar;51(3):225-9. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.51.3.225.
As the profession of psychology has matured, serious interest has surfaced over the past decade in obtaining prescription privileges within the practitioner community. Other nonphysician disciplines have exercised this clinical responsibility for years, significantly improving their ability to comprehensively serve current and new populations. Efforts are underway to develop appropriate and viable training modules. The primary objection expressed by medicine is once again that our practitioners will become "public health hazards." Not surprisingly, resistance to change exists within psychology's training programs. However, the power to prescribe represents the authority to ensure that psychotropic medications are appropriately utilized, if used at all, and will ensure that psychology's practitioners can address society's pressing needs.
随着心理学专业的成熟,在过去十年里,从业者群体中对获得处方权产生了浓厚兴趣。其他非医师学科多年来一直在履行这一临床职责,显著提高了他们全面服务现有和新人群的能力。目前正在努力开发合适且可行的培训模块。医学方面再次提出的主要反对意见是,我们的从业者将成为“公共卫生隐患”。不出所料,心理学培训项目内部存在对变革的抵触情绪。然而,开具处方的权力代表着确保精神药物得到合理使用(如果确实使用的话)的权威,并且将确保心理学从业者能够满足社会的迫切需求。