Bannwarth B, Péhourcq F, Schaeverbeke T, Dehais J
Department of Rheumatology, University of Bordeaux, France.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996 Mar;30(3):194-210. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199630030-00002.
Low-dose pulse methotrexate has emerged as one of the most frequently used slow-acting, symptom-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) because of its favourable risk-benefit profile. Methotrexate is a weak bicarboxylic acid structurally related to folic acid. The most widely used methods for the analysis of methotrexate are immunoassays, particularly fluorescence polarisation immunoassay. After oral administration, the drug is rapidly but incompletely absorbed. Since food does not significantly affect the bioavailability of oral methotrexate in adult patients, the drug may be taken regardless of meals. There is a marked interindividual variability in the extent of absorption of oral methotrexate. Conversely, the intraindividual variability is moderate even over a long time period. Intramuscular and subcutaneous injections of methotrexate result in comparable pharmacokinetics, suggesting that these routes of administration are interchangeable. A mean protein binding to serum albumin of 42 to 57% is usually reported. Again, the unbound fraction exhibits a large interindividual variability. The steady-state volume of distribution is approximately 1 L/kg. Methotrexate distributes to extravascular compartments, including synovial fluid, and to different tissues, especially kidney, liver and joint tissues. Finally, the drug is transported into cells, mainly by a carrier-mediated active transport process. Methotrexate is partly oxidised by hepatic aldehyde oxidase to 7-hydroxymethotrexate. This main, circulating metabolite is over 90% bound to serum albumin. Both methotrexate and 7-hydroxy-methotrexate may be converted to polyglutamyl derivatives which are selectively retained in cells. Methotrexate is mainly excreted by the kidney as intact drug regardless of the route of administration. The drug is filtered by the glomeruli, and then undergoes both secretion and reabsorption processes within the tubule. These processes are differentially saturable, resulting in possible nonlinear elimination pharmacokinetics. The usually reported mean values for the elimination half-life and the total body clearance of methotrexate are 5 to 8 hours and 4.8 to 7.8 L/h, respectively. A positive correlation between methotrexate clearance and creatinine clearance has been found by some authors. Finally, the pharmacokinetics of low-dose methotrexate appears to be highly variable and largely unpredictable even in patients with normal renal and hepatic function. Furthermore, studies in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis provide evidence of age-dependent pharmacokinetics of the drug. These features must be considered when judging the individual clinical response to methotrexate therapy. Various drugs currently used in RA may interact with methotrexate. Aspirin might affect methotrexate disposition to a greater extent than other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs without causing greater toxicity. Corticosteroids do not interfere with the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate, whereas chloroquine may reduce the gastrointestinal absorption of the drug. Folates, especially folic acid, have been shown to reduce the adverse effects of methotrexate without compromising its efficacy in RA. Finally, both trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (cotrimoxazole) and probenecid lead to increased toxicity of methotrexate, and hence should be avoided in patients receiving these drugs. A relationship between oral dosage and efficacy has been found in the range 5 to 20mg methotrexate weekly. The plateau of efficacy is attained at approximately 10 mg/m2/week in most patients. No clear relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical response has been demonstrated. Overall, the dosage must be individualised because of interindividual variability in the dose-response curve. This variability is probably related, at least in part, to the wide interindividual variability in the disposition of the drug.
低剂量脉冲式甲氨蝶呤因其良好的风险效益比,已成为类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中最常用的慢作用、改善症状的抗风湿药物之一。甲氨蝶呤是一种与叶酸结构相关的弱二羧酸。分析甲氨蝶呤最广泛使用的方法是免疫测定法,尤其是荧光偏振免疫测定法。口服给药后,药物迅速但不完全吸收。由于食物对成年患者口服甲氨蝶呤的生物利用度影响不大,因此该药物可在饭前或饭后服用。口服甲氨蝶呤的吸收程度存在明显的个体间差异。相反,即使在很长一段时间内,个体内差异也较小。肌内注射和皮下注射甲氨蝶呤的药代动力学相当,表明这些给药途径可相互替换。通常报道甲氨蝶呤与血清白蛋白的平均蛋白结合率为42%至57%。同样,未结合部分也存在较大的个体间差异。稳态分布容积约为1L/kg。甲氨蝶呤分布到血管外间隙,包括滑液,并分布到不同组织,尤其是肾脏、肝脏和关节组织。最后,药物主要通过载体介导的主动转运过程进入细胞。甲氨蝶呤部分被肝脏醛氧化酶氧化为7-羟基甲氨蝶呤。这种主要的循环代谢物与血清白蛋白的结合率超过90%。甲氨蝶呤和7-羟基甲氨蝶呤都可能转化为聚谷氨酸衍生物,这些衍生物选择性地保留在细胞内。无论给药途径如何,甲氨蝶呤主要通过肾脏以原形药物排泄。药物由肾小球滤过,然后在肾小管内经历分泌和重吸收过程。这些过程具有不同程度的饱和性,可能导致非线性消除药代动力学。通常报道的甲氨蝶呤消除半衰期和全身清除率的平均值分别为5至8小时和4.8至7.8L/h。一些作者发现甲氨蝶呤清除率与肌酐清除率之间呈正相关。最后,即使在肾功能和肝功能正常的患者中,低剂量甲氨蝶呤的药代动力学似乎也高度可变且很大程度上不可预测。此外,对幼年类风湿关节炎患者的研究提供了该药物药代动力学存在年龄依赖性的证据。在判断个体对甲氨蝶呤治疗的临床反应时,必须考虑这些特征。目前用于RA的各种药物可能与甲氨蝶呤相互作用。阿司匹林对甲氨蝶呤处置的影响可能比其他非甾体抗炎药更大,但不会导致更大的毒性。皮质类固醇不干扰甲氨蝶呤的药代动力学,而氯喹可能会降低该药物的胃肠道吸收。叶酸,尤其是叶酸,已被证明可减少甲氨蝶呤的不良反应,而不会损害其在RA中的疗效。最后,甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(复方新诺明)和丙磺舒都会导致甲氨蝶呤毒性增加,因此接受这些药物治疗的患者应避免使用。在每周5至20mg甲氨蝶呤的剂量范围内,已发现口服剂量与疗效之间存在关系。大多数患者在约10mg/m²/周时达到疗效平台。尚未证明药代动力学参数与临床反应之间存在明确关系。总体而言,由于剂量反应曲线存在个体间差异,必须个体化给药。这种差异可能至少部分与药物处置的广泛个体间差异有关。