Banting J D, Friberg P, Adams M A
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
J Hypertens. 1996 Aug;14(8):975-81.
To determine the quantitative roles played by the different vasoconstrictor systems in the acute pressor response in conscious rats before and after inhibition of nitric oxide synthase with Nw-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME).
In conscious male Sprague-Dawley rats, previously instrumented with aortic and venous catheters, the contributions of the different systems were assessed by maximal cumulative pharmacological blockade of alpha 1-adrenoceptors (1 mg/kg prazosin intraperitoneally), AT1 receptors (30 mg/kg losartan intraperitoneally) and V1/V2 receptors (10 mg/kg [beta-mercapto-beta, beta-cyclopenta-methylenepropionyl1, O-Et-Tyr2-Val4-Arg8]-vasopressin per min intravenously). In addition, the contribution of endothelin-1-induced vasoconstriction in response to 100 mg/kg L-NAME intraperitoneally to the hypertension was assessed by administering 5-100 mg/kg ETA/ETB receptor antagonist PD 145 065 intravenously under three different conditions: as the last step of a series of antagonists in the cumulative pharmacological blockade after having induced the L-NAME pressor response; alone before L-NAME treatment; and alone after the full development of the L-NAME pressor response. A separate group of rats was treated acutely with 30 mg/kg losartan intraperitoneally or pretreated for 3 days with 30 mg/kg angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril via drinking water alone or in combination with 1% salt was used to assess the role of the renin-angiotensin system in the L-NAME-induced hypertension.
Short-term administration of the combined ETA/ETB receptor antagonist PD 145065 did not change the arterial pressure under control conditions. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system, alpha 1-adrenoceptors or vasopressin receptors alone or in combination did not alter the magnitude of the L-NAME pressor response. In contrast, our results show that both treatments before and during acute nitric oxide synthase blockade hypertension using the ETA/ETB receptor antagonist PD 145065 abolished almost completely (approximately 85%) the pressor response.
These studies indicate that the predominant mechanism of hypertension, at least in the acute phase, after acute nitric oxide synthase blockade with L-NAME is associated with a marked increase in ETA/ETB receptor activation rather than with increases in alpha 1, AT1 and V1/V2 receptor activation. It remains to be determined whether endothelin participates also in the chronic phase of nitric oxide-deficient hypertension.
确定在用Nω-硝基-L-精氨酸甲酯(L-NAME)抑制一氧化氮合酶前后,不同血管收缩系统在清醒大鼠急性升压反应中所起的定量作用。
在先前已植入主动脉和静脉导管的清醒雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠中,通过对α1肾上腺素能受体(腹腔注射1mg/kg哌唑嗪)、AT1受体(腹腔注射30mg/kg氯沙坦)和V1/V2受体(静脉注射10mg/kg [β-巯基-β,β-环戊亚甲基丙酰基1,O-乙基-Tyr2-Val4-Arg8]-血管加压素)进行最大累积药理学阻断来评估不同系统的作用。此外,通过在三种不同条件下静脉注射5 - 100mg/kg ETA/ETB受体拮抗剂PD 145065,评估腹腔注射100mg/kg L-NAME后内皮素-1诱导的血管收缩对高血压的作用:作为诱导L-NAME升压反应后累积药理学阻断系列拮抗剂的最后一步;在L-NAME治疗前单独使用;以及在L-NAME升压反应完全发展后单独使用。另一组大鼠腹腔注射30mg/kg氯沙坦进行急性处理,或单独通过饮水或与1%盐联合使用30mg/kg血管紧张素I转换酶抑制剂依那普利预处理3天,以评估肾素-血管紧张素系统在L-NAME诱导的高血压中的作用。
在对照条件下,短期给予联合的ETA/ETB受体拮抗剂PD 145065不会改变动脉血压。单独或联合抑制肾素-血管紧张素系统、α1肾上腺素能受体或血管加压素受体不会改变L-NAME升压反应的幅度。相反,我们的结果表明,在使用ETA/ETB受体拮抗剂PD 145065急性阻断一氧化氮合酶高血压之前和期间进行的两种处理几乎完全消除了(约85%)升压反应。
这些研究表明,至少在急性期,在用L-NAME急性阻断一氧化氮合酶后高血压的主要机制与ETA/ETB受体激活的显著增加有关,而不是与α1、AT1和V1/V2受体激活的增加有关。内皮素是否也参与一氧化氮缺乏性高血压的慢性期仍有待确定。