Proano E, Perbeck L G
Department of Surgery, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1996 Sep;30(3):195-200. doi: 10.3109/02844319609062814.
Necrosis of the skin resulting from impaired perfusion is one possible complication of subcutaneous mastectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of two differently sited skin incisions on the circulation in the nipple-areola complex and in the surrounding skin. Sixty-nine patients with invasive breast cancer underwent subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with a subcutaneously placed prosthesis. In 26 of them a "lazy-S"-shaped horizontal lateral incision was made, and in 43 patients a transverse incision 1.5 cm above and parallel to the submammary fold. The skin circulation was measured by two methods, laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and fluorescein flowmetry, two or three days postoperatively. The skin circulation in the nipple-areola complex and in the skin 2 cm above the complex was the same irrespective of which of the two incisions was used, both by LDF and fluorescein flowmetry, but 2 cm below the complex fluorescein flowmetry showed 36% lower circulation in the submammary incision group than in the group with a lazy-S incision (p < 0.01), in contrast to LDF, which did not show any differences between the incisions. The circulation measured by LDF was higher in all three areas both with the lazy-S incision and with the submammary incision than in the opposite untreated breast. With fluorescein flowmetry there was a corresponding increase by 36% (p < 0.01) below the complex in the lazy-S incision group. There was no skin necrosis. In conclusion, the site of the skin incision used in this study did not influence the circulation in the nipple-areola complex or in the skin 2 cm above the complex as measured by LDF and fluorescein flowmetry. However, there was a reduction of the superficial circulation as measured by fluorescein flowmetry 2 cm below the complex in the submammary incision group. The increased circulation in the breast operated on was probably the result of traumatic hyperaemia.
灌注受损导致的皮肤坏死是皮下乳房切除术的一种可能并发症。本研究的目的是评估两种不同位置的皮肤切口对乳头乳晕复合体及周围皮肤血液循环的影响。69例浸润性乳腺癌患者接受了皮下乳房切除术,并立即使用皮下放置的假体进行重建。其中26例采用“L”形水平外侧切口,43例采用在乳房下皱襞上方1.5 cm处的横向平行切口。术后两三天通过激光多普勒血流仪(LDF)和荧光素血流仪两种方法测量皮肤血液循环。无论使用哪种切口,通过LDF和荧光素血流仪测量,乳头乳晕复合体及其上方2 cm处皮肤的血液循环是相同的,但在复合体下方2 cm处,荧光素血流仪显示乳房下切口组的血液循环比“L”形切口组低36%(p<0.01),而LDF显示切口之间无差异。LDF测量的血液循环在“L”形切口和乳房下切口的所有三个区域均高于对侧未治疗的乳房。荧光素血流仪测量显示,“L”形切口组复合体下方相应增加了36%(p<0.01)。未发生皮肤坏死。总之,本研究中使用的皮肤切口位置,通过LDF和荧光素血流仪测量,并未影响乳头乳晕复合体或其上方2 cm处皮肤的血液循环。然而,乳房下切口组在复合体下方2 cm处,荧光素血流仪测量显示浅表血液循环减少。手术侧乳房血液循环增加可能是创伤性充血的结果。