Sand P K
Evanston Continence Center of Evanston Hospital, Northwestern University Medical School, Illinois, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov;88(5):757-60. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00271-2.
To determine the efficacy and safety of transvaginal pelvic floor stimulation in the treatment of women with genuine stress incontinence and detrusor instability complicated by a low-pressure urethra.
Twenty-six consecutive women with mixed incontinence complicated by a low-pressure urethra who elected to try pelvic floor stimulation were studied. Visual analogue symptom scales and weekly incontinence episodes were compared before and after 8 weeks of twice-daily device use.
The symptoms of stress and urge incontinence were completely resolved in six (23%) and ten (38%) women, respectively. Ten of 26 subjects (38%) had greater than 50% overall symptomatic improvement, and two subjects (8%) were completely dry during their last week of therapy. Symptoms of urinary frequency, urgency, and stress incontinence improved significantly. No factors were found to be predictive of treatment success.
Pelvic floor stimulation was found to be an effective and safe treatment for some patients with genuine stress incontinence and detrusor instability complicated by a low-pressure urethra.
确定经阴道盆底刺激治疗真性压力性尿失禁及合并低压尿道的逼尿肌不稳定女性患者的疗效和安全性。
对连续入选的26例合并低压尿道的混合性尿失禁且选择尝试盆底刺激治疗的女性患者进行研究。在每日使用该装置2次、为期8周的治疗前后,比较视觉模拟症状量表评分及每周尿失禁发作次数。
分别有6例(23%)和10例(38%)女性患者的压力性尿失禁和急迫性尿失禁症状完全缓解。26例受试者中有10例(38%)总体症状改善超过50%,2例受试者(8%)在治疗的最后一周完全无尿失禁。尿频、尿急和压力性尿失禁症状均有显著改善。未发现可预测治疗成功的因素。
对于部分真性压力性尿失禁及合并低压尿道的逼尿肌不稳定患者,盆底刺激是一种有效且安全的治疗方法。